P Monsalve1, S Ren1, G Triolo2, L Vazquez1, A D Henderson3, M Kostic1, P Gordon1, W J Feuer1, V Porciatti4. 1. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. 2. Head and Neck Department, IRCCS St. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. 3. Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Columbia, MD, USA. 4. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. vporciatti@med.miami.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate within-test variability of the steady-state PERG (SS-PERG). METHODS: SS-PERGs were recorded in response to black-white horizontal gratings (1.6 cycles/deg, 98% contrast, 15.63 reversals/s, LED display, 25 deg square field, 800 cd/sqm mean luminance) using skin electrodes. PERG and noise (± reference) signals were averaged over 1024 epochs (~ 2.2 min) and Fourier analyzed to retrieve SS-PERG amplitude and phase. SS-PERGs were split into 16 partial averages (samples) of 64 epochs each, and corresponding amplitudes and phases combined in polar coordinates to assess their dispersion (within-test variability). To assess time-dependent variability, samples were clustered in four successive time segments of ~ 33 s each. Amplitude adaptation was defined as amplitude difference between initial and final clusters, and PERG phase adaptation as the corresponding phase difference. To determine the dynamic range of SS-PERG adaptation, recording was performed in normal controls of different age (n = 32) and patients with different severity of optic nerve dysfunction (early manifest glaucoma, EMG, n = 7; non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, NAION, n = 5). RESULTS: Amplitude adaptation was largest in younger controls (amplitude adaptation ÷ noise, SNR = 9.5, 95% CI 13.1, 5.9) and progressively decreased with increasing age (older subjects, SNR = 5.5, 95% CI 9.2, 1.8) and presence of disease (EMG: SNR = 2.4, 95% CI 3.5, 1.4; NAION: SNR = 1.9, 95% CI 6.5,-2.2). In 11 young subjects, amplitude adaptation was repeatable (test-retest in two sessions a week apart; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.59). Phase adaptation was not significantly different from zero in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: SS-PERG adaptation accounts for a sizeable portion of the within-test variability. As it has robust SNR, sufficient test-retest variability, and is altered in disease, it may have physiological and clinical significance. This study suggests that SS-PERG protocols should include adaptation in addition to SS-PERG amplitude and phase/latency.
PURPOSE: To investigate within-test variability of the steady-state PERG (SS-PERG). METHODS: SS-PERGs were recorded in response to black-white horizontal gratings (1.6 cycles/deg, 98% contrast, 15.63 reversals/s, LED display, 25 deg square field, 800 cd/sqm mean luminance) using skin electrodes. PERG and noise (± reference) signals were averaged over 1024 epochs (~ 2.2 min) and Fourier analyzed to retrieve SS-PERG amplitude and phase. SS-PERGs were split into 16 partial averages (samples) of 64 epochs each, and corresponding amplitudes and phases combined in polar coordinates to assess their dispersion (within-test variability). To assess time-dependent variability, samples were clustered in four successive time segments of ~ 33 s each. Amplitude adaptation was defined as amplitude difference between initial and final clusters, and PERG phase adaptation as the corresponding phase difference. To determine the dynamic range of SS-PERG adaptation, recording was performed in normal controls of different age (n = 32) and patients with different severity of optic nerve dysfunction (early manifest glaucoma, EMG, n = 7; non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, NAION, n = 5). RESULTS: Amplitude adaptation was largest in younger controls (amplitude adaptation ÷ noise, SNR = 9.5, 95% CI 13.1, 5.9) and progressively decreased with increasing age (older subjects, SNR = 5.5, 95% CI 9.2, 1.8) and presence of disease (EMG: SNR = 2.4, 95% CI 3.5, 1.4; NAION: SNR = 1.9, 95% CI 6.5,-2.2). In 11 young subjects, amplitude adaptation was repeatable (test-retest in two sessions a week apart; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.59). Phase adaptation was not significantly different from zero in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: SS-PERG adaptation accounts for a sizeable portion of the within-test variability. As it has robust SNR, sufficient test-retest variability, and is altered in disease, it may have physiological and clinical significance. This study suggests that SS-PERG protocols should include adaptation in addition to SS-PERG amplitude and phase/latency.
Authors: Vittorio Porciatti; Brandon Bosse; Prashant K Parekh; Olga A Shif; William J Feuer; Lori M Ventura Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2014 Oct-Nov Impact factor: 2.503