Literature DB >> 22330394

Electroretinographic responses to photoreceptor specific sine wave modulation.

Jan Kremers1, Gobinda Pangeni.   

Abstract

Electroretinographic responses to cone and rod isolating stimuli and to simultaneous L- and M-cone modulation were measured at different temporal frequencies between 2 and 60 Hz and at two mean luminances using a four primary stimulator. The responses driven by each photoreceptor type had distinct characteristics. The responses to stimuli containing L- and/or M-cone stimulation indicated the presence of two underlying mechanisms that were active in distinct frequency regions. Between 2 and 12 Hz, the responses displayed properties that were reminiscent of the L-M-cone opponent system. At higher temporal frequencies, the electroretinograms were more determined by the luminance content in the stimuli.
© 2012 Optical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22330394     DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.29.00A306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  11 in total

1.  A method for estimating intrinsic noise in electroretinographic (ERG) signals.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Beatrix Feigl; Pradeep K Kambhampati; Amithavikram R Hathibelagal; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Rod- versus cone-driven ERGs at different stimulus sizes in normal subjects and retinitis pigmentosa patients.

Authors:  Avinash J Aher; Declan J McKeefry; Neil R A Parry; John Maguire; I J Murray; Tina I Tsai; Cord Huchzermeyer; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Dingcai Cao; Frederick T Collison; Gerald A Fishman; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Rod- and cone-isolated flicker electroretinograms and their response summation characteristics.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Rod- and cone-driven responses in mice expressing human L-cone pigment.

Authors:  Tina I Tsai; Jenny Atorf; Maureen Neitz; Jay Neitz; Jan Kremers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A modified silent substitution electroretinography protocol to separate photoreceptor subclass function in lightly sedated dogs.

Authors:  E N Wise; M L Foster; J Kremers; F M Mowat
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 1.644

7.  Comparison of macaque and human L- and M-cone driven electroretinograms.

Authors:  Jan Kremers; Avinash J Aher; Neil R A Parry; Nimesh B Patel; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  The spatial properties of L- and M-cone inputs to electroretinograms that reflect different types of post-receptoral processing.

Authors:  Mellina M Jacob; Gobinda Pangeni; Bruno D Gomes; Givago S Souza; Manoel da Silva Filho; Luiz Carlos L Silveira; John Maguire; Neil R A Parry; Declan J McKeefry; Jan Kremers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Rod Electroretinograms Elicited by Silent Substitution Stimuli from the Light-Adapted Human Eye.

Authors:  John Maguire; Neil R A Parry; Jan Kremers; Deepika Kommanapalli; Ian J Murray; Declan J McKeefry
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  The influence of temporal frequency and stimulus size on the relative contribution of luminance and L-/M-cone opponent mechanisms in heterochromatic flicker ERGs.

Authors:  Jan Kremers; Avinash J Aher; Yassen Popov; Maziar Mirsalehi; Cord Huchzermeyer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.