Literature DB >> 26282499

Accuracy of Component Positioning in 1980 Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Comparative Analysis by Surgical Technique and Mode of Guidance.

Benjamin G Domb1, John M Redmond2, Steven S Louis3, Kris J Alden3, Robert J Daley3, Justin M LaReau4, Alexandra E Petrakos3, Chengcheng Gui3, Carlos Suarez-Ahedo3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this multi-surgeon study was to assess and compare the accuracy of acetabular component placement, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and global offset difference (GOD) between six different surgical techniques and modes of guidance in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 1980 THAs met inclusion criteria. Robotic- and navigation-guided techniques were more consistent than other techniques in placing the acetabular cup into Lewinnek's safe zone (P<0.005 and P<0.05, respectively). Robotic-guided surgery was more consistent than other techniques in placing the acetabular component within Callanan's safe zone (P<0.005). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in the frequency of patients with excessive LLD. Clinically significant differences between groups were not found in the frequency of patients with excessive GOD. Level of Evidence: IV.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; component placement; hip arthroplasty; multi surgeon; robotic-guided

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26282499     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  27 in total

1.  Can a simple iPad app improve C-arm based component position in anterior THA?

Authors:  Ulrich Bechler; Bernhard Springer; Kilian Rueckl; Tim Rolvien; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Technology in Arthroplasty: Are We Improving Value?

Authors:  Bradford S Waddell; Kaitlin Carroll; Seth Jerabek
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

3.  [Early effectiveness of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty via direct superior approach].

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Xingshan Wang; Dejin Yang; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

4.  [Robot-assisted joint arthroplasty-An emerging technology of the present and the future].

Authors:  Jun Fu; Ming Ni; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  [Application of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip].

Authors:  Gujun Xu; Mingyang Ma; Shuai Zhang; Yubo Liu; Xiangpeng Kong; Wei Chai
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 6.  Characteristics and trends of the most cited papers in robotic assisted arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rami H Mahmoud; Juan J Lizardi; Jonathan Weinerman; Dennis J Vanden Berge; David S Constantinescu; Ramakanth Yakkanti
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 7.  Comparing early and mid-term outcomes between robotic-arm assisted and manual total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linsen T Samuel; Alexander J Acuña; Bilal Mahmood; Ahmed K Emara; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-30

8.  Learning navigation - Learning with navigation. A review.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Frederic Picard
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-06-02

9.  Component placement accuracy of two digital intraoperative fluoroscopy supplementation systems in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler Thorne; Scott Nishioka; Samantha Andrews; Kristin Mathews; Cass Nakasone
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Computer navigation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dominic Davenport; Venu Kavarthapu
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2016-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.