Literature DB >> 33751477

Cardiac 15O-water PET: Does mismatched attenuation correction not matter?

Benjamin C Lee1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2021        PMID： 33751477     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-021-02573-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   3.872


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

1.  Assessment of endothelial function and myocardial flow reserve using (15)O-water PET without attenuation correction.

Authors:  Stéphane Tuffier; Damien Legallois; Annette Belin; Michael Joubert; Alban Bailliez; Michel Redonnet; Denis Agostini; Alain Manrique
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT with three different CT protocols: a comparison with conventional PET.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Frank Bengel; Raymonde Busch; Coletta Kruschke; Helga Fernolendt; Denise Lee; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Cardiac PET/CT misregistration causes significant changes in estimated myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  Mahadevan Rajaram; Abdel K Tahari; Andy H Lee; Martin A Lodge; Benjamin Tsui; Stephan Nekolla; Richard L Wahl; Frank M Bengel; Paco E Bravo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Low-dose quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging using 15O-water and PET without attenuation correction.

Authors:  Mark Lubberink; Hendrik J Harms; Rick Halbmeijer; Stefan de Haan; Paul Knaapen; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow with H215O and dynamic positron-emission tomography. Strategy for quantification in relation to the partial-volume effect.

Authors:  H Iida; I Kanno; A Takahashi; S Miura; M Murakami; K Takahashi; Y Ono; F Shishido; A Inugami; N Tomura
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Chad R R N Hunter; Ran Klein; Rob S Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O.

Authors:  S R Bergmann; K A Fox; A L Rand; K D McElvany; M J Welch; J Markham; B E Sobel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Direct comparison of [13N]ammonia and [15O]water estimates of perfusion with quantification of regional myocardial blood flow by microspheres.

Authors:  A Bol; J A Melin; J L Vanoverschelde; T Baudhuin; D Vogelaers; M De Pauw; C Michel; A Luxen; D Labar; M Cogneau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  EANM procedural guidelines for PET/CT quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Mark Lubberink; Fabien Hyafil; Antti Saraste; Riemer H J A Slart; Denis Agostini; Carmela Nappi; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Effect of PET-CT misalignment on the quantitative accuracy of cardiac 15O-water PET.

Authors:  Jonny Nordström; Hendrik J Harms; Tanja Kero; Maryam Ebrahimi; Jens Sörensen; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.872
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.