Literature DB >> 19011135

Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?

Andrew J Einstein.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 19011135     DOI： 10.1136/hrt.2007.135731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN： 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Assessment of endothelial function and myocardial flow reserve using (15)O-water PET without attenuation correction.

Authors:  Stéphane Tuffier; Damien Legallois; Annette Belin; Michael Joubert; Alban Bailliez; Michel Redonnet; Denis Agostini; Alain Manrique
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Myocardial perfusion scans: projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Dorothea McAreavey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Radiation burden in myocardial imaging: an old concern in the new age of hi-tech, hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Strategies for defining an optimal risk-benefit ratio for stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Vasken Dilsizian; Andrew J Einstein; Edward P Ficaro; Milena Henzlova; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The evolving practice of nuclear cardiology: results from the 2011 ASNC member survey.

Authors:  Peter Tilkemeier; Jacqueline Green; Andrew J Einstein; Reza Fazel; Patricia Reames; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  SPECT vs CT: CT is not the first line test for the diagnosis and prognosis of stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Zachary J Trzaska; Mylan C Cohen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Preoperative coronary risk assessment with dual-source CT in patients undergoing noncoronary cardiac surgery.

Authors:  V Buffa; C N De Cecco; L Cossu; S Fedeli; A Vallone; R Ruopoli; M Luzietti; G Angelica; V David; F Musumeci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark J Eisenberg; Jonathan Afilalo; Patrick R Lawler; Michal Abrahamowicz; Hugues Richard; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by coregistered 64-slice coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Victor Y Cheng; Damini Dey; Jonghye Woo; Amit Ramesh; Serge Van Kriekinge; Yasuzuki Suzuki; Yaron Elad; Ronald Karlsberg; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.