Literature DB >> 26280354

Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.

B Dustin Pooler1, David H Kim1, Jennifer M Weiss1, Kristina A Matkowskyj1, Perry J Pickhardt1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate and characterize nondiminutive colorectal polyps prospectively detected by using computed tomographic (CT) colonography but not confirmed with subsequent nonblinded optical colonoscopy (OC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved; the need for signed informed consent was waived. Over 113 months, 9336 adults (mean age, 57.1 years) underwent CT colonography, which yielded 2606 nondiminutive (≥6 mm) polyps. Of 1731 polyps that underwent subsequent nonblinded OC (ie, endoscopists provided advanced knowledge of specific polyp size, location, and morphologic appearance at CT colonography), 181 (10%) were not confirmed with initial endoscopy (ie, discordant), of which 37 were excluded (awaiting or lost to follow-up). After discordant polyp review, 66 of the 144 lesions were categorized as likely CT colonography false-positive findings (no further action) and 78 were categorized as potential OC false-negative (FN) findings.
RESULTS: Thirty-one of 144 (21.5%) of all discordant lesions were confirmed as FN findings at OC, including 40% (31 of 78) of those with OC and/or CT colonography follow-up. OC FN lesions were an average of 8.5 mm ± 3.3 in diameter and were identified with higher confidence at prospective CT colonography (on a 3-point confidence scale: mean, 2.8 vs 2.3; P = .001). OC FN findings were more likely than concordant polyps to be located in the right colon (respectively, 71% [22 of 31] vs 47% [723 of 1535]; P = .010). Most (81% [21 of 26]) OC FN lesions that were ultimately resected were neoplastic (adenomas or serrated lesions), of which 43% (nine of 21) were characterized as advanced lesions, and 89% (eight of nine) of advanced lesions occurred in the right colon.
CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, polyps prospectively identified with CT colonography but not confirmed with subsequent nonblinded (ie, despite a priori knowledge of the CT colonography findings) OC require additional review because a substantial proportion may be FN findings. Most FN findings found with OC demonstrated clinically significant histopathologic results, and a majority of advanced lesions occurred in the right colon. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26280354      PMCID: PMC4720545          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1,339 asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Pamela A Nugent; William R Schindler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal.

Authors:  Michael E Zalis; Matthew A Barish; J Richard Choi; Abraham H Dachman; Helen M Fenlon; Joseph T Ferrucci; Seth N Glick; Andrea Laghi; Michael Macari; Elizabeth G McFarland; Martina M Morrin; Perry J Pickhardt; Jorge Soto; Judy Yee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2002-01

5.  Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development.

Authors:  B Vogelstein; E R Fearon; S R Hamilton; S E Kern; A C Preisinger; M Leppert; Y Nakamura; R White; A M Smits; J L Bos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

Authors:  D K Rex; C S Cutler; G T Lemmel; E Y Rahmani; D W Clark; D J Helper; G A Lehman; D G Mark
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an updated review.

Authors:  H T Lynch; T C Smyrk; P Watson; S J Lanspa; J F Lynch; P M Lynch; R J Cavalieri; C R Boland
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; J Richard Choi; William R Schindler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Christopher Vinden; Cindy Li; Jingsong He; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Bryan Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Richard B Halberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Judy Yee; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-03

3.  Colorectal Findings at Repeat CT Colonography Screening after Initial CT Colonography Screening Negative for Polyps Larger than 5 mm.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Ifeanyi Mbah; Jennifer M Weiss; David H Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Almost One-Third of Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Are Missed on CT Colonography.

Authors:  Manish Singla; Jean D Kemp; Michael E Goldberg; Vito V Cirigliano; Gilda M Bobele; Ganesh R Veerappan; Patrick E Young
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Davide Bellini; David Burling; Giovanni Cappello; Cristina Carretero; Evelien Dekker; Rami Eliakim; Margriet de Haan; Michal F Kaminski; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Martina Morrin; Deirdre McNamara; Emanuele Neri; Silvia Pecere; Mathieu Pioche; Andrew Plumb; Emanuele Rondonotti; Manon Cw Spaander; Stuart Taylor; Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jaap Stoker; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.