Literature DB >> 15300577

Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis.

Brian Bressler1, Lawrence F Paszat, Christopher Vinden, Cindy Li, Jingsong He, Linda Rabeneck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy contains an inherent miss rate for colorectal cancer. Although miss rates from academic centers or units known for their endoscopic expertise have been previously reported, the colorectal cancer miss rate of colonoscopy performed in usual clinical practice is unknown. We conducted a population-based study to estimate the proportion of right-sided colon cancers missed during colonoscopy in Ontario.
METHODS: All persons > or =20 years old with a new diagnosis of right-sided colon cancer admitted to the hospital for surgical resection in Ontario from April 1, 1997, to March 31, 2001, were identified. Patients who had a colonoscopy within 3 years of their diagnosis were divided into 2 groups: detected cancers (those who had a colonoscopy up to 6 months before the diagnosis) and missed cancers (those who had a colonoscopy between 6 and 36 months before the diagnosis). Data were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan database, and the Registered Persons Database.
RESULTS: Between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 2001, we identified 4920 persons with a new diagnosis of right-sided colon cancer, of whom 2654 (53.9%) had had at least 1 colonoscopy within 3 years of their admission for surgical resection. Most (96.0%) had had their most recent colonoscopy up to 6 months before admission (detected cancers). However, 105 patients (4.0%) had their most recent colonoscopy between 6 and 36 months before admission to the hospital (missed cancers).
CONCLUSIONS: Among persons undergoing resection for right-sided colon cancer, the miss rate of colonoscopy for detecting cancer in usual clinical practice was 4.0%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15300577     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  87 in total

1.  Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods.

Authors:  Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Francisco C Ramirez; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

4.  Colorectal Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon Walsh; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Christoph Schramm; Nadine Mbaya; Jeremy Franklin; Muenevver Demir; Fabian Kuetting; Ulrich Toex; Tobias Goeser; Hans-Michael Steffen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The 2005 Annual Meeting of the British Society of Gastroenterology. Birmingham, United Kingdom, 14-17 March 2005. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Screening tests for colorectal cancer: a menu of options remains relevant.

Authors:  James E Allison; Michael Lawson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Quality indicators in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 9.  Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Polyp surveillance.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.