Literature DB >> 26269622

Commutability of the First World Health Organization International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus.

R T Hayden1, J Preiksaitis2, Y Tong2, X Pang3, Y Sun4, L Tang4, L Cook5, S Pounds4, J Fryer6, A M Caliendo7.   

Abstract

Quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA has become a standard part of care for many groups of immunocompromised patients; recent development of the first WHO international standard for human CMV DNA has raised hopes of reducing interlaboratory variability of results. Commutability of reference material has been shown to be necessary if such material is to reduce variability among laboratories. Here we evaluated the commutability of the WHO standard using 10 different real-time quantitative CMV PCR assays run by eight different laboratories. Test panels, including aliquots of 50 patient samples (40 positive samples and 10 negative samples) and lyophilized CMV standard, were run, with each testing center using its own quantitative calibrators, reagents, and nucleic acid extraction methods. Commutability was assessed both on a pairwise basis and over the entire group of assays, using linear regression and correspondence analyses. Commutability of the WHO material differed among the tests that were evaluated, and these differences appeared to vary depending on the method of statistical analysis used and the cohort of assays included in the analysis. Depending on the methodology used, the WHO material showed poor or absent commutability with up to 50% of assays. Determination of commutability may require a multifaceted approach; the lack of commutability seen when using the WHO standard with several of the assays here suggests that further work is needed to bring us toward true consensus.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269622      PMCID: PMC4572535          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01495-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Multi-Site PCR-based CMV viral load assessment-assays demonstrate linearity and precision, but lack numeric standardization: a report of the association for molecular pathology.

Authors:  Daynna J Wolff; Denise Lamarche Heaney; Paul D Neuwald; Kathleen A Stellrecht; Richard D Press
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Multicenter evaluation of a commercial cytomegalovirus quantitative standard: effects of commutability on interlaboratory concordance.

Authors:  R T Hayden; M D Shahbazian; A Valsamakis; J Boonyaratanakornkit; L Cook; X L Pang; J K Preiksaitis; E R Schönbrunner; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  International standards and reference materials for quantitative molecular infectious disease testing.

Authors:  Roberta M Madej; Jack Davis; Marcia J Holden; Stan Kwang; Emmanuel Labourier; George J Schneider
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 4.  Cytomegalovirus quantification: where to next in optimising patient management?

Authors:  Claire Atkinson; Vincent C Emery
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 5.  Molecular diagnostics: harmonization through reference materials, documentary standards and proficiency testing.

Authors:  Marcia J Holden; Roberta M Madej; Philip Minor; Lisa V Kalman
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Comparative evaluation of three commercial quantitative cytomegalovirus standards by use of digital and real-time PCR.

Authors:  R T Hayden; Z Gu; S S Sam; Y Sun; L Tang; S Pounds; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Harmonisation of Measurement Procedures: how do we get it done?

Authors:  Mary Lou Gantzer; W Greg Miller
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2012-08

8.  Factors contributing to variability of quantitative viral PCR results in proficiency testing samples: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  R T Hayden; X Yan; M T Wick; A B Rodriguez; X Xiong; C C Ginocchio; M J Mitchell; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Marked variability of BK virus load measurement using quantitative real-time PCR among commonly used assays.

Authors:  Noah G Hoffman; Linda Cook; Ederlyn E Atienza; Ajit P Limaye; Keith R Jerome
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  A commutable cytomegalovirus calibrator is required to improve the agreement of viral load values between laboratories.

Authors:  Angela M Caliendo; Mona D Shahbazian; Carl Schaper; Jessica Ingersoll; Deborah Abdul-Ali; Jerry Boonyaratanakornkit; Xiao-Li Pang; Julie Fox; Jutta Preiksaitis; E Ralf Schönbrunner
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  23 in total

1.  Commutability of the World Health Organization International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus: Standard or Assay.

Authors:  Jacqueline F Fryer; Clare L Morris; Neil M Almond; Philip D Minor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Reply to "Commutability of the World Health Organization International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus: Standard or Assay".

Authors:  Sara Jones; George J Schneider; Shiaolan Y Ho
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A Comprehensive Statistical Framework for Determination of Commutability, Accuracy, and Agreement in Clinical DNAemia Assays.

Authors:  L Tang; Y Su; Z Gu; A M Caliendo; S Pounds; R T Hayden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Standardization of Nucleic Acid Tests: the Approach of the World Health Organization.

Authors:  S A Baylis; P Wallace; E McCulloch; H G M Niesters; C M Nübling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Quantitative Assessment of Commutability for Clinical Viral Load Testing Using a Digital PCR-Based Reference Standard.

Authors:  L Tang; Y Sun; D Buelow; Z Gu; A M Caliendo; S Pounds; R T Hayden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Progress in Quantitative Viral Load Testing: Variability and Impact of the WHO Quantitative International Standards.

Authors:  R T Hayden; Y Sun; L Tang; G W Procop; D R Hillyard; B A Pinsky; S A Young; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of RG7667, a Combination Monoclonal Antibody, for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Julie H Ishida; Anita Patel; Aneesh K Mehta; Philippe Gatault; Jacqueline M McBride; Tracy Burgess; Michael A Derby; David R Snydman; Brinda Emu; Becket Feierbach; Ashley E Fouts; Mauricio Maia; Rong Deng; Carrie M Rosenberger; Lynn A Gennaro; Natalee S Striano; X Charlene Liao; Jorge A Tavel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Calibration of BK Virus Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing to the 1st WHO International Standard for BK Virus.

Authors:  Susanna K Tan; Stephen Milligan; Malaya K Sahoo; Nathaniel Taylor; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation.

Authors:  Ajit P Limaye; Tara M Babu; Michael Boeckh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  NEOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS FROM CYTOMEGALOVIRUS NECROTIZING RETINOPATHY IN PATIENTS AFTER HAPLOIDENTICAL HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION.

Authors:  Ze Long; Jing Hou; Heng Miao
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.