Literature DB >> 22930604

Harmonisation of Measurement Procedures: how do we get it done?

Mary Lou Gantzer1, W Greg Miller.   

Abstract

Clinical laboratory measurement results must be comparable among different measurement procedures, different locations and different times in order to be used appropriately for identifying and managing disease conditions. Harmonisation in the broad sense is the overall process of achieving comparability of results among clinical laboratory measurement procedures that measure the same measurand. The term standardisation is used when comparable results among measurement procedures are based on calibration traceability to SI using a reference measurement procedure of the highest available order. When there is no higher order reference measurement procedure available, and it is unlikely that one can be developed, the term harmonisation refers to any process for achieving comparable results among measurement procedures for an individual measurand.This review explains calibration traceability and focuses on the principles of harmonisation for those measurands for which a reference measurement procedure does not exist. We discuss the value of harmonisation, the importance of commutable reference materials, the barriers to harmonisation that exist today, and conclude with a discussion of a current global effort to improve the state of harmonisation.

Year:  2012        PMID: 22930604      PMCID: PMC3428258     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  21 in total

1.  Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: a call for standardization.

Authors:  N Binkley; D Krueger; C S Cowgill; L Plum; E Lake; K E Hansen; H F DeLuca; M K Drezner
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Moritz Klaas; Christian Müller; Dietmar Schnorr; Stefan A Loening; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Accuracy in clinical chemistry - who will kiss Sleeping Beauty awake?

Authors:  Linda M Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Standardization of C-peptide measurements.

Authors:  Randie R Little; Curt L Rohlfing; Alethea L Tennill; Richard W Madsen; Kenneth S Polonsky; Gary L Myers; Carla J Greenbaum; Jerry P Palmer; Eduard Rogatsky; Daniel T Stein
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Comparative effectiveness research priorities: identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making.

Authors:  Kalipso Chalkidou; Danielle Whicher; Weslie Kary; Sean Tunis
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  Follicle stimulating hormone international standards and reference preparations for the calibration of immunoassays and bioassays.

Authors:  M P Rose
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1998-05-25       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  Patient safety and clinical effectiveness as imperatives for achieving harmonization inside and outside the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Ronald W McLawhon
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  A model for a comprehensive measurement system in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  N W Tietz
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  A commutable cytomegalovirus calibrator is required to improve the agreement of viral load values between laboratories.

Authors:  Angela M Caliendo; Mona D Shahbazian; Carl Schaper; Jessica Ingersoll; Deborah Abdul-Ali; Jerry Boonyaratanakornkit; Xiao-Li Pang; Julie Fox; Jutta Preiksaitis; E Ralf Schönbrunner
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 10.  Variation in parathyroid hormone immunoassay results--a critical governance issue in the management of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Catharine M Sturgeon; Stuart M Sprague; Wendy Metcalfe
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  3 in total

1.  Progress in Quantitative Viral Load Testing: Variability and Impact of the WHO Quantitative International Standards.

Authors:  R T Hayden; Y Sun; L Tang; G W Procop; D R Hillyard; B A Pinsky; S A Young; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Commutability of the First World Health Organization International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  R T Hayden; J Preiksaitis; Y Tong; X Pang; Y Sun; L Tang; L Cook; S Pounds; J Fryer; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Test Results: The Role of the IVD Industry.

Authors:  Dave Armbruster; James Donnelly
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-02-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.