Literature DB >> 28053213

Calibration of BK Virus Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing to the 1st WHO International Standard for BK Virus.

Susanna K Tan1, Stephen Milligan2, Malaya K Sahoo3, Nathaniel Taylor2, Benjamin A Pinsky4,2,3.   

Abstract

Significant interassay variability in the quantification of BK virus (BKV) DNA precludes establishing broadly applicable thresholds for the management of BKV infection in transplantation. The 1st WHO International Standard for BKV (primary standard) was introduced in 2016 as a common calibrator for improving the harmonization of BKV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) and enabling comparisons of biological measurements worldwide. Here, we evaluated the Altona RealStar BKV assay (Altona) and calibrated the results to the international unit (IU) using the Exact Diagnostics BKV verification panel, a secondary standard traceable to the primary standard. The primary and secondary standards on Altona had nearly identical linear regression equations (primary standard, Y = 1.05X - 0.28, R2 = 0.99; secondary standard, Y = 1.04X - 0.26, R2 = 0.99) and conversion factors (primary standard, 1.11 IU/copy; secondary standard, 1.09 IU/copy). A comparison of Altona with a laboratory-developed BKV NAAT assay in IU/ml versus copies/ml using Passing-Bablok regression revealed similar regression lines, no proportional bias, and improvement in the systematic bias (95% confidence interval of intercepts: copies/ml, -0.52 to -1.01; IU/ml, 0.07 to -0.36). Additionally, Bland-Altman analyses revealed a clinically significant reduction of bias when results were reported in IU/ml (IU/ml, -0.10 log10; copies/ml, -0.70 log10). These results indicate that the use of a common calibrator improved the agreement between the two assays. As clinical laboratories worldwide use calibrators traceable to the primary standard to harmonize BKV NAAT results, we anticipate improved interassay comparisons with a potential for establishing broadly applicable quantitative BKV DNA load cutoffs for clinical practice.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  molecular methods; polyomavirus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28053213      PMCID: PMC5328461          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02315-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Impact of genomic sequence variability on quantitative PCR assays for diagnosis of polyomavirus BK infection.

Authors:  P Randhawa; J Kant; R Shapiro; H Tan; A Basu; C Luo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative evaluation of three commercial quantitative cytomegalovirus standards by use of digital and real-time PCR.

Authors:  R T Hayden; Z Gu; S S Sam; Y Sun; L Tang; S Pounds; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  BK virus genotype variance and discordant BK viremia PCR assay results.

Authors:  J Trofe-Clark; T Sparkes; C Gentile; V Van Deerlin; D Sawinski; R D Bloom
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: An Approach Proposal and Update on Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  S Gonzalez; D P Escobar-Serna; O Suarez; X Benavides; J F Escobar-Serna; E Lozano
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Factors contributing to variability of quantitative viral PCR results in proficiency testing samples: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  R T Hayden; X Yan; M T Wick; A B Rodriguez; X Xiong; C C Ginocchio; M J Mitchell; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Are We There Yet? Impact of the First International Standard for Cytomegalovirus DNA on the Harmonization of Results Reported on Plasma Samples.

Authors:  Jutta K Preiksaitis; Randall T Hayden; Yupin Tong; Xiaoli L Pang; Jacqueline F Fryer; Alan B Heath; Linda Cook; Astrid K Petrich; Brian Yu; Angela M Caliendo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Currently recommended BK virus (BKV) plasma viral load cutoff of ≥4 log10/mL underestimates the diagnosis of BKV-associated nephropathy: a single transplant center experience.

Authors:  S Hassan; C Mittal; S Amer; F Khalid; A Patel; R Delbusto; L Samuel; G Alangaden; M Ramesh
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Marked variability of BK virus load measurement using quantitative real-time PCR among commonly used assays.

Authors:  Noah G Hoffman; Linda Cook; Ederlyn E Atienza; Ajit P Limaye; Keith R Jerome
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  H H Hirsch; P Randhawa
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Commutability of the Epstein-Barr virus WHO international standard across two quantitative PCR methods.

Authors:  Janaki Abeynayake; Ryan Johnson; Paolo Libiran; Malaya K Sahoo; Hongbin Cao; Raffick Bowen; K C Allen Chan; Quynh-Thu Le; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Standardization of Nucleic Acid Tests: the Approach of the World Health Organization.

Authors:  S A Baylis; P Wallace; E McCulloch; H G M Niesters; C M Nübling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Matrix Matters: Assessment of Commutability among BK Virus Assays and Standards.

Authors:  R T Hayden; Y Su; J Boonyaratanakornkit; L Cook; Z Gu; K R Jerome; B A Pinsky; S S Sam; S K Tan; H Zhu; L Tang; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 11.677

3.  Molecular profiling of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Atif Saleem; Henning Stehr; James L Zehnder; Benjamin A Pinsky; Christian A Kunder
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Identification and Quantitation of Transplant-Related DNA Viruses.

Authors:  Meredith L Carpenter; Susanna K Tan; Thomas Watson; Rowena Bacher; Vaishnavi Nagesh; Alain Watts; Gordon Bentley; Jenna Weber; ChunHong Huang; Malaya K Sahoo; Armin Hinterwirth; Thuy Doan; Theodore Carter; Queeny Dong; Stéphane Gourguechon; Eric Harness; Sean Kermes; Srihari Radhakrishnan; Gongbo Wang; Alejandro Quiroz-Zárate; Jesus Ching; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Sam Kant; Alana Dasgupta; Serena Bagnasco; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 5.818

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.