Literature DB >> 9445501

Reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in pediatric patients.

L Mahajan1, R Wyllie, L Oliva, F Balsells, R Steffen, M Kay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the widespread use of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring for evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children, there is little published information regarding the reproducibility of ambulatory pH studies in this patient population. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in pediatric patients.
METHODS: We prospectively investigated 26 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux (14 females and 12 males) ranging in age from 1 month to 18 years (mean, 9.2 years). The patients underwent extended intraesophageal pH monitoring over two consecutive 24-hour periods.
RESULTS: Data analysis revealed that the overall reproducibility of ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring is only 69% (r = 0.32). Eight of 26 patients had conflicting results on day 1 compared with results on day 2. Of the 8 patients with conflicting results on day 1 versus day 2, 5 had normal studies on day 1, but demonstrated pathologic reflux on day 2. Thus, the false-negative rate for day 1 was 19.2%. The kappa statistic calculated for the total time the pH was abnormal was 0.32, with values < 0.4 representing poor correlation. Spearman correlation coefficients indicated that the percentage of time with pH < 4 (r = 0.64) and the number of reflux episodes (r = 0.71) per 24-hour period are the most reproducible pH parameters.
CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the pediatric population is suboptimal. The investigation should be extended or repeated if the result does not correlate with the patient's clinical history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9445501     DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.2.260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic interpretation of extended pH monitoring: is there a single best method?

Authors:  Vasundhara Tolia; Anne Wuerth; Ronald Thomas
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children with asthma: treatment implications.

Authors:  Mark D Scarupa; Nanako Mori; Brendan J Canning
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Prevalence and associated features of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a Caucasian-predominant adolescent school population.

Authors:  T S Gunasekaran; Mary Dahlberg; Priya Ramesh; Ganesh Namachivayam
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Low reproducibility of 2 x 24-hour continuous esophageal pH monitoring in infants and children: a limiting factor for interventional studies.

Authors:  Rasmus Gaardskaer Nielsen; Søren Kruse-Andersen; Steffen Husby
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Effect of anesthesia on gastroesophageal reflux in children: a study using BRAVO wireless pH study measurements.

Authors:  L Rodriguez; A Morley-Fletcher; A Souza; L Rosengaus; S Nurko
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Comparison of the efficiencies of esophageal manometry, vector volume analysis and esophagus pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Emrah Aydın; Rahşan Özcan; Ergun Erdoğan; Gonca Tekant
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 7.  [Chronic cough in childhood].

Authors:  M Pradal; K Retornaz; A Poisson
Journal:  Rev Mal Respir       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.622

8.  Regurgitation in healthy and non healthy infants.

Authors:  Flavia Indrio; Giuseppe Riezzo; Francesco Raimondi; Luciano Cavallo; Ruggiero Francavilla
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.638

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.