Literature DB >> 15781546

The effects of cricoid pressure, remifentanil, and propofol on esophageal motility and the lower esophageal sphincter.

Kristian Thorn1, Sven-Egron Thorn, Magnus Wattwil.   

Abstract

Cricoid pressure is the gold standard during the induction of anesthesia when there is a risk of aspiration of gastric contents. However, the effect of cricoid pressure during the different steps of complete anesthesia induction has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of cricoid pressure, remifentanil, and propofol on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal motility. We recorded LES pressure (LESP) and calculated barrier pressure ([BrP] = LESP - gastric pressure) in 10 healthy volunteers using a Dent sleeve device. There was a significant decrease in LESP and BrP when a cricoid pressure of 30 N was performed in the awake volunteers (P < 0.05). However, this effect was not seen during the infusion of remifentanil 0.2 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1). Remifentanil per se or together with a bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg IV did not induce any statistical change in LESP or BrP. Remifentanil abolished spontaneous esophageal motility and completely eliminated the experience of discomfort induced by cricoid pressure. In conclusion, cricoid pressure of 30 N induced a decrease of LESP and BrP in awake volunteers. These effects were not seen during the remifentanil infusion. This shows the importance of when to apply cricoid pressure during rapid-sequence induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781546     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000147508.31879.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

1.  Beware of etomidate and cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction.

Authors:  Patrick Braun; Peter Paal
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [Cricoid pressure].

Authors:  D Steinmann; H-J Priebe
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparative effect of the sites of anterior cervical pressure on the geometry of the upper esophageal sphincter high-pressure zone.

Authors:  Ling Mei; Hongmei Jiao; Tarun Sharma; Arshish Dua; Patrick Sanvanson; Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  The yield of a continuously patent gastroesophageal junction during upper endoscopy as a predictor of esophagitis in children.

Authors:  Nataly Zion; Elena Chemodanov; Arie Levine; Igor Sukhotnik; Jacob Bejar; Ron Shaoul
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Pharmacological dissection of the human gastro-oesophageal segment into three sphincteric components.

Authors:  James G Brasseur; Rhys Ulerich; Qing Dai; Dalipkumar K Patel; Ahmed M S Soliman; Larry S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Effect of anesthesia on gastroesophageal reflux in children: a study using BRAVO wireless pH study measurements.

Authors:  L Rodriguez; A Morley-Fletcher; A Souza; L Rosengaus; S Nurko
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Risk scores for predicting dysphagia in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Zhou; Wei-Hua Dong; Chu-Huan Zhao; Xia-Fei Feng; Wei-Wei Wen; Wen-Yi Tu; Meng-Xing Cai; Tian-Cheng Xu; Qiang-Li Xie
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Effect of Propofol on Acid Reflux Measured with the Bravo pH Monitoring System.

Authors:  Anupama Chawla; Eugenia Girda; Grace Walker; Frances Turcotte Benedict; Mila Tempel; Jeffrey Morganstern
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.