Literature DB >> 26254481

Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern Colonoscopy Reporting System (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations.

Celette Sugg Skinner1, Samir Gupta2, Ethan A Halm3, Shaun Wright4, Katharine McCallister5, Wendy Bishop5, Noel Santini6, Christian Mayorga6, Deepak Agrawal6, Brett Moran6, Joanne M Sanders5, Amit G Singal3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Through colonoscopy, polyps can be identified and removed to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Appropriate use of surveillance colonoscopy, post polypectomy, is a focus of healthcare reform.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors developed and implemented the first electronic medical record-based colonoscopy reporting system (CoRS) that matches endoscopic findings with guideline-consistent surveillance recommendations and generates tailored results and recommendation letters for patients and providers.
RESULTS: In its first year, CoRS was used in 98.6% of indicated cases. Via a survey, colonoscopists agreed/strongly agreed it is easy to use (83%), provides guideline-based recommendations (89%), improves quality of Spanish letters (94%), they would recommend it for other institutions (78%), and it made their work easier (61%), and led to improved practice (56%). DISCUSSION: CoRS' widespread adoption and acceptance likely resulted from stakeholder engagement throughout the development and implementation process.
CONCLUSION: CoRS is well-accepted by clinicians and provides guideline-based recommendations and results communications to patients and providers.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; decision support; surveillance; tailored intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26254481      PMCID: PMC5009919          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  23 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Daniel A Sussman; Chyke A Doubeni; Daniel S Anderson; Lukejohn Day; Amar R Deshpande; B Joseph Elmunzer; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Jeanette Mendez; Ma Somsouk; James Allison; Taft Bhuket; Zhuo Geng; Beverly B Green; Steven H Itzkowitz; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Differences in colorectal carcinoma stage and survival by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Chloe Chien; Libby M Morimoto; Jamie Tom; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Electronic medical records and improving the quality of the screening process.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Nora Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Dianne M Finkelstein; Kathleen Garrett; Robert W Haile; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Robert S Sandler; Carol Burke; Deirdre A Hill; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Kathleen A Cronin; Nancy Breen; William R Waldron; Anita H Ambs; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Amanpal Singh; Nischita Reddy; Taylor S Riall; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

8.  Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Celette Sugg Skinner; Susan M Perkins; Jeffrey Springston; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Kathleen M Russell; Yan Tong; Netsanet Gebregziabher; Connie Krier; Esther Smith-Howell; Tawana Brady-Watts; Laura J Myers; Deborah Ballard; Broderick Rhyant; Deanna R Willis; Thomas F Imperiale; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice.

Authors:  Robert E Schoen; Paul F Pinsky; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Douglas J Reding; Richard B Hayes; Timothy Church; Susan Yurgalevich; V Paul Doria-Rose; Tom Hickey; Thomas Riley; Christine D Berg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium.

Authors:  Jasmin A Tiro; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Yingye Zheng; Joanne S Schottinger; Carolyn M Rutter; Douglas A Corley; Celette S Skinner; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta; Karen J Wernli; Carrie Klabunde
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy.

Authors:  Melissa Magrath; Edward Yang; Chul Ahn; Christian A Mayorga; Purva Gopal; Caitlin C Murphy; Samir Gupta; Deepak Agrawal; Ethan A Halm; Eric K Borton; Celette Sugg Skinner; Amit G Singal
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Predictors of guideline concordance for surveillance colonoscopy recommendations in patients at a safety-net health system.

Authors:  Ben Kahn; Zachary Freeland; Purva Gopal; Deepak Agrawal; Christian A Mayorga; Rozina Mithani; Celette Sugg Skinner; Ethan A Halm; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cloud-based multi-media systems for patient education and adherence: a pilot study to explore patient compliance with colonoscopy procedure preparation.

Authors:  Benjamin Schooley; Tonia San Nicolas-Rocca; Richard Burkhard
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2019-09-12

4.  Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.

Authors:  Carla G Abou Fadel; Rani H Shayto; Ala I Sharara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03

5.  Time-saving polyp detection in colon capsule endoscopy: evaluation of a novel software algorithm.

Authors:  Johannes Hausmann; Jan-Peter Linke; Jörg G Albert; Johannes Masseli; Andrea Tal; Alica Kubesch; Natalie Filmann; Michael Philipper; Michael Farnbacher
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.