Literature DB >> 19818779

Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice.

Robert E Schoen1, Paul F Pinsky, Joel L Weissfeld, Lance A Yokochi, Douglas J Reding, Richard B Hayes, Timothy Church, Susan Yurgalevich, V Paul Doria-Rose, Tom Hickey, Thomas Riley, Christine D Berg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The recommended timing of surveillance colonoscopy for individuals with adenomatous polyps is based on adenoma histology, size, and number. The burden and cost of surveillance colonoscopy are significant. The aim of this study was to examine the use of surveillance colonoscopy on a community-wide basis.
METHODS: We retrospectively queried participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer screening trial in 9 US communities about use of surveillance colonoscopy. Subjects whose initial colonoscopy showed advanced adenoma (AA), nonadvanced adenoma (NAA), or no adenoma (NA) findings were included. Colonoscopy examinations were confirmed by reviewing colonoscopy reports.
RESULTS: Of 3876 subjects selected for inquiry, 3627 (93.6%) responded. The cumulative probability of a surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years was 58.4% (n = 1342) in the AA group, 57.5% in those with >or=3 NAAs (n = 117), 46.7% in those with 1-2 NAAs (n = 905), and 26.5% (n = 1263) in subjects with NAs. Within 7 years, 33.2% of subjects with AAs received >or=2 surveillance examinations versus 26.9% for those with >or=3 NAAs, 18.2% for those with 1 or 2 NAAs, and 10.4% for those with NAs. Incomplete colonoscopy, family history of colorectal cancer, or interval adenomatous findings could explain only a minority of surveillance colonoscopy in low-risk subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: In community practice, there is substantial overuse of surveillance colonoscopy among low-risk subjects and underuse among subjects with AAs. Interventions to better align use of surveillance colonoscopy with risk for advanced lesions are needed. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19818779      PMCID: PMC2813330          DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  23 in total

1.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Somnath Saha; Tom Hoerger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  P C Prorok; G L Andriole; R S Bresalier; S S Buys; D Chia; E D Crawford; R Fogel; E P Gelmann; F Gilbert; M A Hasson; R B Hayes; C C Johnson; J S Mandel; A Oberman; B O'Brien; M M Oken; S Rafla; D Reding; W Rutt; J L Weissfeld; L Yokochi; J K Gohagan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

6.  Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  S Vijan; J Inadomi; R A Hayward; T P Hofer; A M Fendrick
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Pauline A Mysliwiec; Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas.

Authors:  W S Atkin; B C Morson; J Cuzick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Surveillance after positive and negative colonoscopy examinations: issues, yields, and use.

Authors:  Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  71 in total

1.  Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.

Authors:  Heba Iskandar; Yan Yan; Jill Elwing; Dayna Early; Graham A Colditz; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Colonoscopy: Colorectal cancer screening is a 'package'.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.

Authors:  Eun Ran Kim; Dong Hyun Sinn; Jin Yong Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Pitfalls of using administrative data for research.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Reinier G S Meester; Samir Gupta; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Concerns and challenges in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  Akeem O Adebogun; Christine D Berg; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2012-08

7.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 8.  Quality improvement in gastroenterology clinical practice.

Authors:  Rakhi Kheraj; Sumeet K Tewani; Gyanprakash Ketwaroo; Daniel A Leffler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

10.  Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Robert S Sandler; Janet M Grubber; Marcus R Johnson; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.