Literature DB >> 26376891

Predictors of guideline concordance for surveillance colonoscopy recommendations in patients at a safety-net health system.

Ben Kahn1,2, Zachary Freeland1,2, Purva Gopal3, Deepak Agrawal1,2, Christian A Mayorga1,2, Rozina Mithani1,2, Celette Sugg Skinner4,5, Ethan A Halm1,2,4, Amit G Singal6,7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Appropriate surveillance intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is one of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2014 physician quality reporting system measures. Appropriateness of surveillance intervals will continue to be monitored closely, particularly as reimbursements become tied to quality measures. AIMS: Quantify and identify predictors for guideline-concordant surveillance recommendations after adenoma polypectomy.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had colonoscopy with polypectomy at a safety-net health system between June 2011 and December 2013. Surveillance recommendations shorter and longer than guideline recommendations were defined as potential overuse and underuse. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify correlates of guideline-concordant surveillance recommendations, overuse, and underuse.
RESULTS: Among 1,822 patients with polypectomy, 1,329 had ≥1 adenoma. Surveillance interval recommendations were guideline-concordant in 1,410 (77.4%) patients, potential overuse in 263 (14.4%), potential underuse in 85 (4.7%), and missing in 64 (3.5%) patients. Predictors of guideline-concordant recommendations in multivariate analyses included age >65 years (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.80), incomplete resection (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.41-9.09), and good/excellent prep quality (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.72-2.86). Underuse recommendations were more likely in patients with ≥3 adenomas; overuse recommendations were more likely in patients with high-grade dysplasia or fair prep quality and less likely in those with piecemeal resection, ≥3 adenomas, age >65, or Hispanic ethnicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance recommendations are not concordant with guidelines in one of four cases. Interventions to improve prep quality and guideline concordance of surveillance recommendations can improve cost-effectiveness of CRC screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Colonoscopy; Colorectal adenomas; Prep quality; Screening; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26376891      PMCID: PMC5615815          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0661-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  24 in total

1.  Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; P L De Garmo; D E Fleischer; G M Eisen; M Helfand
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.

Authors:  Heba Iskandar; Yan Yan; Jill Elwing; Dayna Early; Graham A Colditz; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Tzuyung D Kou; Jill S Barnholtz Sloan; Siran M Koroukian; Mark D Schluchter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  J Sint Nicolaas; V de Jonge; O van Baalen; F J G M Kubben; W Moolenaar; M F J Stolk; E J Kuipers; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Amanpal Singh; Nischita Reddy; Taylor S Riall; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

9.  Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice.

Authors:  David F Ransohoff; Bonnie Yankaskas; Ziya Gizlice; Lisa Gangarosa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice.

Authors:  Robert E Schoen; Paul F Pinsky; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Douglas J Reding; Richard B Hayes; Timothy Church; Susan Yurgalevich; V Paul Doria-Rose; Tom Hickey; Thomas Riley; Christine D Berg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

2.  Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy.

Authors:  Melissa Magrath; Edward Yang; Chul Ahn; Christian A Mayorga; Purva Gopal; Caitlin C Murphy; Samir Gupta; Deepak Agrawal; Ethan A Halm; Eric K Borton; Celette Sugg Skinner; Amit G Singal
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Samir Gupta; Celette Sugg Skinner; Chul Ahn; Noel O Santini; Deepak Agrawal; Christian A Mayorga; Caitlin Murphy; Jasmin A Tiro; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Adam C Loewen; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The potential impact of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid expansion on reducing colorectal cancer screening disparities in African American males.

Authors:  Wizdom Powell; Leah Frerichs; Rachel Townsley; Maria Mayorga; Jennifer Richmond; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephanie Wheeler; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.