Literature DB >> 26810839

Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.

Carla G Abou Fadel1, Rani H Shayto1, Ala I Sharara2.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Colonoscopy is a powerful screening method for colorectal cancer. However, colonoscopy performance is highly variable and quality indicators are needed to ensure delivery of high-quality healthcare. A multi-society task force has recently identified three priority quality indicators in colonoscopy: adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and adherence to surveillance guidelines. The best-studied quality indicator is the adenoma detection rate, which is inversely correlated to the risk of interval colorectal cancer. Other important quality determinants include colonoscopy withdrawal time and the bowel preparation quality. It is important to note that these quality metrics are interrelated and optimization at every level is necessary for any high-quality colorectal cancer screening and prevention program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; Colon; Colorectal cancer; Endoscopy; Indicators; Screening

Year:  2016        PMID: 26810839     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-016-0073-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  76 in total

Review 1.  Image-enhanced, chromo, and cap-assisted colonoscopy for improving adenoma/neoplasia detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fumio Omata; Sachiko Ohde; Gautam A Deshpande; Daiki Kobayashi; Katsunori Masuda; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Matthew D Rutter; Roger G Blanks; Sue M Moss; Andrew F Goddard; Andrew Chilton; Claire Nickerson; Richard J Q McNally; Julietta Patnick; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Split-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Ala I Sharara; Ali H Harb; Fayez S Sarkis; Jean M Chalhoub; Rami Badreddine; Fadi H Mourad; Mahmoud Othman; Omar Masri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaodong Liu; Hui Luo; Lin Zhang; Felix W Leung; Zhiguo Liu; Xiangping Wang; Rui Huang; Na Hui; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.

Authors:  George Ou; Edward Kim; Pardis Lakzadeh; Jessica Tong; Robert Enns; Alnoor Ramji; Scott Whittaker; Hin Hin Ko; Brian Bressler; Lawrence Halparin; Eric Lam; Jack Amar; Jennifer Telford
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Eric E Elliott; Jennifer L Mickevicius; Brittany B Graustein; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Colonoscopy: quality indicators.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.488

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cloud-based multi-media systems for patient education and adherence: a pilot study to explore patient compliance with colonoscopy procedure preparation.

Authors:  Benjamin Schooley; Tonia San Nicolas-Rocca; Richard Burkhard
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2019-09-12

2.  Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Peel Jung; Su B Park; Hyung W Kim; Dae H Kang; Cheol W Choi; Su J Kim; Hyeong S Nam; Dae G Ryu; Joung B Hong; Dong J Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.