Literature DB >> 26253789

Authors' reply to "Dosimetric of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery: only 'an exercise of style'".

Harald Treuer1, Moritz Hoevels2, Klaus Luyken2, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle2, Jochen Wirths2, Martin Kocher3, Maximilian Ruge2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26253789     DOI： 10.1007/s00066-015-0881-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN： 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  When is better best? A multiobjective perspective.

Authors:  Mark H Phillips; Clay Holdsworth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Apparatus dependence of normal brain tissue dose in stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Lijun Ma; Paula Petti; Brian Wang; Martina Descovich; Cynthia Chuang; Igor J Barani; Sandeep Kunwar; Dennis C Shrieve; Arjun Sahgal; David A Larson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Dosimetric comparison of different treatment modalities for stereotactic radiosurgery of meningioma.

Authors:  David Kaul; Harun Badakhshi; Thierry Gevaert; Diana Pasemann; Volker Budach; Constantin Tuleasca; Constantin Tulaesca; Arne Gruen; Vikas Prasad; Marc Levivier; Markus Kufeld
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines.

Authors:  E Shaw; R Kline; M Gillin; L Souhami; A Hirschfeld; R Dinapoli; L Martin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases. A report of the DEGRO Working Group on Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Martin Kocher; Andrea Wittig; Marc Dieter Piroth; Harald Treuer; Heinrich Seegenschmiedt; Maximilian Ruge; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with an adapted linear accelerator vs. robotic radiosurgery: Comparison of dosimetric treatment plan quality.

Authors:  Harald Treuer; Moritz Hoevels; Klaus Luyken; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Jochen Wirths; Martin Kocher; Maximilian Ruge
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Dosimetric comparison of Linac-based (BrainLAB®) and robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife ®) stereotactic system plans for acoustic schwannoma.

Authors:  Debnarayan Dutta; S Balaji Subramanian; V Murli; H Sudahar; P G Gopalakrishna Kurup; Mahadev Potharaju
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Dosimetric comparison of different treatment modalities for stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations and acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  Thierry Gevaert; Marc Levivier; Thomas Lacornerie; Dirk Verellen; Benedikt Engels; Nick Reynaert; Koen Tournel; Michael Duchateau; Truus Reynders; Tom Depuydt; Christine Collen; Eric Lartigau; Mark De Ridder
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Effect of the embolization material in the dose calculation for stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Olga Olinca Galván de la Cruz; José Manuel Lárraga-Gutiérrez; Sergio Moreno-Jiménez; Olivia Amanda García-Garduño; Miguel Angel Celis
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 1.482

10.  Robotic radiosurgery versus micro-multileaf collimator: a dosimetric comparison for large or critically located arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Sławomir Blamek; Aleksandra Grządziel; Leszek Miszczyk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.481
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.