Literature DB >> 26245254

Fully automatic and nonparametric quantification of adipose tissue in fat-water separation MR imaging.

Defeng Wang1,2,3, Lin Shi4,5, Winnie C W Chu6, Miao Hu7, Brian Tomlinson7, Wen-Hua Huang8, Tianfu Wang9, Pheng Ann Heng10, David K W Yeung1, Anil T Ahuja1.   

Abstract

Despite increasing demand and research efforts, currently there is no consensus on the protocol for automated and reliable quantification of adipose tissue (AT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) using MRI. The purpose of this study was to propose a novel computational method with enhanced objectiveness for the quantification of AT and VAT in fat-water separation MRI. 3T data from IDEAL were acquired for the fat-water separation. Fat tissues were separated from nonfat regions (background air, bone, water, and other nonfat tissues) using K-means clustering (K = 2). From the binary fat mask, arm regions were separated from body based on the relative size of connected component. AT was obtained from the binary body fat mask. With the initial contour as the outer boundary of body fat, the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and VAT were separated using deformable model driven by a specifically generated deformation field pointing to the inner boundary of SAT. The proposed method was tested on 16 patients with dyslipidemia and evaluated by comparing the correlation with semi-automatic segmentation results. Good robustness was also observed in the proposed method from the Bland-Altman plots. Compared to other established fat segmentation methods, the proposed method is highly objective for fat-water separation MRI with minimal variability induced by subjective parameter settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal fat; Automated segmentation; Subcutaneous adipose tissue; Visceral adipose tissue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26245254     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1347-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  28 in total

1.  Automated and reproducible segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue from abdominal MRI.

Authors:  J Kullberg; H Ahlström; L Johansson; H Frimmel
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow.

Authors:  C Xu; J L Prince
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Quantitative comparison and evaluation of software packages for assessment of abdominal adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Bonekamp; P Ghosh; S Crawford; S F Solga; A Horska; F L Brancati; A M Diehl; S Smith; J M Clark
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  An accurate and robust method for unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI.

Authors:  Vincenzo Positano; Amalia Gastaldelli; Anna Maria Sironi; Maria Filomena Santarelli; Massimo Lombardi; Luigi Landini
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Multi-atlas based segmentation using probabilistic label fusion with adaptive weighting of image similarity measures.

Authors:  C Sjöberg; A Ahnesjö
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Using manual prostate contours to enhance deformable registration of endorectal MRI.

Authors:  M R Cheung; K Krishnan
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Segmentation of pituitary adenoma: a graph-based method vs. a balloon inflation method.

Authors:  Jan Egger; Dženan Zukić; Bernd Freisleben; Andreas Kolb; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  MRI adipose tissue and muscle composition analysis-a review of automation techniques.

Authors:  Magnus Borga
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Automated assessment of thigh composition using machine learning for Dixon magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Yu Xin Yang; Mei Sian Chong; Laura Tay; Suzanne Yew; Audrey Yeo; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Emerging Technologies and their Applications in Lipid Compartment Measurement.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Houchun Harry Hu; Wei Shen; Owen Carmichael
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 12.015

4.  A pilot study of visceral fat and its association with adipokines, stool calprotectin and symptoms in patients with diverticulosis.

Authors:  Kathryn A Murray; Caroline L Hoad; Jill Garratt; Mehri Kaviani; Luca Marciani; Jan K Smith; Britta Siegmund; Penny A Gowland; David J Humes; Robin C Spiller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Implications of Abdominal Adipose Tissue Distribution on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome: A Chinese General Population Study.

Authors:  Chileka Chiyanika; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Henry Lik-Yuen Chan; Steve C N Hui; David K W Yeung; Winnie C W Chu
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.488

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.