Literature DB >> 23339900

Multi-atlas based segmentation using probabilistic label fusion with adaptive weighting of image similarity measures.

C Sjöberg1, A Ahnesjö.   

Abstract

Label fusion multi-atlas approaches for image segmentation can give better segmentation results than single atlas methods. We present a multi-atlas label fusion strategy based on probabilistic weighting of distance maps. Relationships between image similarities and segmentation similarities are estimated in a learning phase and used to derive fusion weights that are proportional to the probability for each atlas to improve the segmentation result. The method was tested using a leave-one-out strategy on a database of 21 pre-segmented prostate patients for different image registrations combined with different image similarity scorings. The probabilistic weighting yields results that are equal or better compared to both fusion with equal weights and results using the STAPLE algorithm. Results from the experiments demonstrate that label fusion by weighted distance maps is feasible, and that probabilistic weighted fusion improves segmentation quality more the stronger the individual atlas segmentation quality depends on the corresponding registered image similarity. The regions used for evaluation of the image similarity measures were found to be more important than the choice of similarity measure.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339900     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  11 in total

1.  Fully automatic and nonparametric quantification of adipose tissue in fat-water separation MR imaging.

Authors:  Defeng Wang; Lin Shi; Winnie C W Chu; Miao Hu; Brian Tomlinson; Wen-Hua Huang; Tianfu Wang; Pheng Ann Heng; David K W Yeung; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  QUADRATIC: Quality of Dice in Registration Circuits.

Authors:  Shikha Chaganti; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03

3.  Automatic pericardium segmentation and quantification of epicardial fat from computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Alexander Norlén; Jennifer Alvén; David Molnar; Olof Enqvist; Rauni Rossi Norrlund; John Brandberg; Göran Bergström; Fredrik Kahl
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 4.  Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Mert R Sabuncu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Dynamic multiatlas selection-based consensus segmentation of head and neck structures from CT images.

Authors:  Rabia Haq; Sean L Berry; Joseph O Deasy; Margie Hunt; Harini Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  How much will linked deformable registrations decrease the quality of multi-atlas segmentation fusions?

Authors:  Carl Sjöberg; Silvia Johansson; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Automatic Thalamus Segmentation from Magnetic Resonance Images Using Multiple Atlases Level Set Framework (MALSF).

Authors:  Minghui Zhang; Zhentai Lu; Qianjin Feng; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Multi-class medical image segmentation using one-vs-rest graph cuts and majority voting.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Hu; Gikas Mageras; Michael Grossberg
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-06-24

9.  Preliminary analysis using multi-atlas labeling algorithms for tracing longitudinal change.

Authors:  Regina E Y Kim; Spencer Lourens; Jeffrey D Long; Jane S Paulsen; Hans J Johnson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Clinical evaluation of multi-atlas based segmentation of lymph node regions in head and neck and prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Carl Sjöberg; Martin Lundmark; Christoffer Granberg; Silvia Johansson; Anders Ahnesjö; Anders Montelius
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.