Literature DB >> 26244001

Thiol-Based Selective Extraction Assay to Comparatively Assess Bioavailable Mercury in Sediments.

Jonathan L Ticknor1, Katarzyna H Kucharzyk1, Kaitlyn A Porter1, Marc A Deshusses1, Heileen Hsu-Kim1.   

Abstract

Bioaccumulation of methylmercury in the aquatic food web is governed in part by the methylation of inorganic divalent mercury (Hg(II)) by anaerobic microorganisms. In sulfidic settings, a small fraction of total Hg(II) is typically bioavailable to methylating microorganisms. Quantification of this fraction is difficult due to uncertainties in the speciation of Hg(II) and the mechanisms of uptake by methylating microbes. However, recent studies have shown that the bioavailable fraction is likely to include a portion of Hg(II) associated with solid phases, that is, nanostructured mercuric sulfides. Moreover, addition of thiols to suspensions of methylating cultures coincides with increased uptake into cells and methylmercury production. Here, we present a thiol-based selective extraction assay to provide information on the bioavailable Hg fraction in sediments. In the procedure, sediment samples were exposed to a nitrogen-purged solution of glutathione (GSH) for 30 min and the amount of GSH-leachable mercury was quantified. In nine sediment samples from a marine location, the relative GSH-leachable mercury concentration was strongly correlated to the relative amount of methylmercury in the sediments (r2=0.91, p<0.0001) across an order of magnitude of methylmercury concentration values. The approach was further applied to anaerobic sediment slurry microcosm experiments in which sediments were cultured under the same microbial growth conditions but were amended with multiple forms of Hg with a known spectrum of bioavailability. GSH-leachable Hg concentrations increased with observed methylmercury concentrations in the microcosms, matching the trend of species bioavailability in our previous work. Results suggest that a thiol-based selective leaching approach is an improvement compared with other proposed methods to assess Hg bioavailability in sediment and that this approach could provide a basis for comparison of sites where Hg methylation is a concern.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioavailability; glutathione; marine sediment; mercury

Year:  2015        PMID: 26244001      PMCID: PMC4507306          DOI: 10.1089/ees.2014.0526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Eng Sci        ISSN: 1092-8758            Impact factor:   1.907


  23 in total

1.  Methylation of mercury by bacteria exposed to dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides.

Authors:  Tong Zhang; Bojeong Kim; Clément Levard; Brian C Reinsch; Gregory V Lowry; Marc A Deshusses; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments.

Authors:  Cynthia C Gilmour; Mircea Podar; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew M Graham; Steven D Brown; Anil C Somenahally; Alex Johs; Richard A Hurt; Kathryn L Bailey; Dwayne A Elias
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Mercury reduction and cell-surface adsorption by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA.

Authors:  Haiyan Hu; Hui Lin; Wang Zheng; Balaji Rao; Xinbin Feng; Liyuan Liang; Dwayne A Elias; Baohua Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment.

Authors:  G C Compeau; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Mercury speciation by X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and sequential chemical extractions: a comparison of speciation methods.

Authors:  Christopher S Kim; Nicolas S Bloom; James J Rytuba; Gordon E Brown
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Estimation of reactive thiol concentrations in dissolved organic matter and bacterial cell membranes in aquatic systems.

Authors:  Claresta Joe-Wong; Elizabeth Shoenfelt; Emily J Hauser; Nyssa Crompton; Satish C B Myneni
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 2. Benthic methylmercury production and bed sediment-pore water partitioning.

Authors:  Mark Marvin-Dipasquale; Michelle A Lutz; Mark E Brigham; David P Krabbenhoft; George R Aiken; William H Orem; Britt D Hall
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Influence of dissolved organic matter on the complexation of mercury under sulfidic conditions.

Authors:  Carrie L Miller; Robert P Mason; Cynthia C Gilmour; Andrew Heyes
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmidt; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  The three modern faces of mercury.

Authors:  Thomas W Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Quantification of Mercury Bioavailability for Methylation Using Diffusive Gradient in Thin-Film Samplers.

Authors:  Udonna Ndu; Geoff A Christensen; Nelson A Rivera; Caitlin M Gionfriddo; Marc A Deshusses; Dwayne A Elias; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.