Literature DB >> 22145980

Methylation of mercury by bacteria exposed to dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides.

Tong Zhang1, Bojeong Kim, Clément Levard, Brian C Reinsch, Gregory V Lowry, Marc A Deshusses, Heileen Hsu-Kim.   

Abstract

The production of the neurotoxic methylmercury in the environment is partly controlled by the bioavailability of inorganic divalent mercury (Hg(II)) to anaerobic bacteria that methylate Hg(II). In sediment porewater, Hg(II) associates with sulfides and natural organic matter to form chemical species that include organic-coated mercury sulfide nanoparticles as reaction intermediates of heterogeneous mineral precipitation. Here, we exposed two strains of sulfate-reducing bacteria to three forms of inorganic mercury: dissolved Hg and sulfide, nanoparticulate HgS, and microparticulate HgS. The bacteria cultures exposed to HgS nanoparticles methylated mercury at a rate slower than cultures exposed to dissolved forms of mercury. However, net methylmercury production in cultures exposed to nanoparticles was 6 times greater than in cultures treated with microscale particles, even when normalized to specific surface area. Furthermore, the methylation potential of HgS nanoparticles decreased with storage time of the nanoparticles in their original stock solution. In bacteria cultures amended with nano-HgS from a 16 h-old nanoparticle stock, 6-10% of total mercury was converted to methylmercury after one day. In contrast, 2-4% was methylated in cultures amended with nano-HgS that was aged for 3 days or 1 week. The methylation of mercury derived from nanoparticles (in contrast to the larger particles) would not be predicted by equilibrium speciation of mercury in the aqueous phase (<0.2 μm) and was possibly caused by the disordered structure of nanoparticles that facilitated release of chemically labile mercury species immediately adjacent to cell surfaces. Our results add new dimensions to the mechanistic understanding of mercury methylation potential by demonstrating that bioavailability is related to the geochemical intermediates of rate-limited mercury sulfide precipitation reactions. These findings could help explain observations that the "aging" of mercury in sediments reduces its methylation potential and provide a basis for assessing and remediating methylmercury hotspots in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22145980     DOI: 10.1021/es203181m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  25 in total

1.  A Phenylamine-Oligothiophene-Based Fluorescent Chemosensor for Selective Detection of Hg(II).

Authors:  Qingfen Niu; Xingxing Wu; Tianduo Li; Yuezhi Cui; Shanshan Zhang; Qiuchen Su
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Mercury distribution in sediment along urban-rural gradient around Shanghai (China): implication for pollution history.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Ling Chen; Wei-Ling Shi; Li-Zao Liu; Yue Li; Xiang-Zhou Meng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mercury-methylating genes dsrB and hgcA in soils/sediments of the Three Gorges Reservoir.

Authors:  Hongxia Du; Ming Ma; Tao Sun; Xianzhu Dai; Caiyun Yang; Feng Luo; Dingyong Wang; Yasuo Igarashi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Biogeochemical controls on mercury methylation in the Allequash Creek wetland.

Authors:  Joel E Creswell; Martin M Shafer; Christopher L Babiarz; Sue-Zanne Tan; Abbey L Musinsky; Trevor H Schott; Eric E Roden; David E Armstrong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Feng He; Jie Gao; Eric Pierce; P J Strong; Hailong Wang; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Total mercury, methyl mercury, and heavy metal concentrations in Hyeongsan River and its tributaries in Pohang city, South Korea.

Authors:  Mark Xavier Bailon; Anneschel Sheehan David; Yeongeon Park; Eunhee Kim; Yongseok Hong
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Highly Selective and Sensitive Colorimetric and Fluorescent Chemosensor for Rapid Detection of Ag+, Cu2+ and Hg2+ Based on a Simple Schiff Base.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhang; Xingxing Wu; Qingfen Niu; Zongrang Guo; Tianduo Li; Haixia Liu
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Detailed assessment of the kinetics of Hg-cell association, Hg methylation, and methylmercury degradation in several Desulfovibrio species.

Authors:  Andrew M Graham; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew C Maizel; Dwayne A Elias; Cynthia C Gilmour
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Relative contributions of mercury bioavailability and microbial growth rate on net methylmercury production by anaerobic mixed cultures.

Authors:  Katarzyna H Kucharzyk; Marc A Deshusses; Kaitlyn A Porter; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.238

10.  Influence of Sulfide Nanoparticles on Dissolved Mercury and Zinc Quantification by Diffusive Gradient in Thin-Film Passive Samplers.

Authors:  Anh Le-Tuan Pham; Carol Johnson; Devon Manley; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.