Literature DB >> 24020841

Mercury reduction and cell-surface adsorption by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA.

Haiyan Hu1, Hui Lin, Wang Zheng, Balaji Rao, Xinbin Feng, Liyuan Liang, Dwayne A Elias, Baohua Gu.   

Abstract

Both reduction and surface adsorption of mercuric mercury [Hg(II)] are found to occur simultaneously on G. sulfurreducens PCA cells under dark, anaerobic conditions. Reduction of Hg(II) to elemental Hg(0) initially follows a pseudo-first order kinetics with a half-life of <2 h in the presence of 50 nM Hg(II) and 10(11) cells L(-1) in a phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Multiple gene deletions of the outer membrane cytochromes in this organism resulted in a decrease in reduction rate from ∼0.3 to 0.05 h(-1), and reduction was nearly absent with heat-killed cells or in the cell filtrate. Adsorption of Hg(II) by cells is found to compete with, and thus inhibit, Hg(II) reduction. Depending on the Hg to cell ratio, maximum Hg(II) reduction was observed at about 5 × 10(-19) mol Hg cell(-1), but reduction terminated at a low Hg to cell ratio (<10(-20) mol Hg cell(-1)). This inhibitory effect is attributed to bonding between Hg(II) and the thiol (-SH) functional groups on cells and validated by experiments in which the sorbed Hg(II) was readily exchanged by thiols (e.g., glutathione) but not by carboxylate compounds such as ethylenediamine-tetraacetate (EDTA). We suggest that coupled Hg(II)-cell interactions, i.e., reduction and surface binding, could be important in controlling Hg species transformation and bioavailability and should therefore be considered in microbial Hg(II) uptake and methylation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24020841     DOI: 10.1021/es400527m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Microbial generation of elemental mercury from dissolved methylmercury in seawater.

Authors:  Cheng-Shiuan Lee; Nicholas S Fisher
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.745

2.  Removal of mercury by adsorption: a review.

Authors:  Jin-Gang Yu; Bao-Yu Yue; Xiong-Wei Wu; Qi Liu; Fei-Peng Jiao; Xin-Yu Jiang; Xiao-Qing Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mercury isotope signatures record photic zone euxinia in the Mesoproterozoic ocean.

Authors:  Wang Zheng; Geoffrey J Gilleaudeau; Linda C Kah; Ariel D Anbar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Synergistic Effects of a Chalkophore, Methanobactin, on Microbial Methylation of Mercury.

Authors:  Xixiang Yin; Lihong Wang; Lijie Zhang; Hongmei Chen; Xujun Liang; Xia Lu; Alan A DiSpirito; Jeremy D Semrau; Baohua Gu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Thiol-Based Selective Extraction Assay to Comparatively Assess Bioavailable Mercury in Sediments.

Authors:  Jonathan L Ticknor; Katarzyna H Kucharzyk; Kaitlyn A Porter; Marc A Deshusses; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.907

6.  Expanded Diversity and Phylogeny of mer Genes Broadens Mercury Resistance Paradigms and Reveals an Origin for MerA Among Thermophilic Archaea.

Authors:  Christos A Christakis; Tamar Barkay; Eric S Boyd
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Mercury Reduction by Nanoparticulate Vivianite.

Authors:  Marjorie Etique; Sylvain Bouchet; James M Byrne; Laurel K ThomasArrigo; Ralf Kaegi; Ruben Kretzschmar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Cobalt Resistance via Detoxification and Mineralization in the Iron-Reducing Bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens.

Authors:  Hunter Dulay; Marcela Tabares; Kazem Kashefi; Gemma Reguera
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.