Literature DB >> 19475941

Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 2. Benthic methylmercury production and bed sediment-pore water partitioning.

Mark Marvin-Dipasquale1, Michelle A Lutz, Mark E Brigham, David P Krabbenhoft, George R Aiken, William H Orem, Britt D Hall.   

Abstract

Mercury speciation, controls on methylmercury (MeHg) production, and bed sediment-pore water partitioning of total Hg (THg) and MeHg were examined in bed sediment from eight geochemically diverse streams where atmospheric deposition was the predominant Hg input. Across all streams, sediment THg concentrations were best described as a combined function of sediment percent fines (%fines; particles < 63 microm) and organic content. MeHg concentrations were best described as a combined function of organic content and the activity of the Hg(II)-methylating microbial community and were comparable to MeHg concentrations in streams with Hg inputs from industrial and mining sources. Whole sediment tin-reducible inorganic reactive Hg (Hg(II)R) was used as a proxy measure for the Hg(II) pool available for microbial methylation. In conjunction with radiotracer-derived rate constants of 203Hg(II) methylation, Hg(II)R was used to calculate MeHg production potential rates and to explain the spatial variability in MeHg concentration. The %Hg(II)R (of THg) was low (2.1 +/- 5.7%) and was inversely related to both microbial sulfate reduction rates and sediment total reduced sulfur concentration. While sediment THg concentrations were higher in urban streams, %MeHg and %Hg(II)R were higher in nonurban streams. Sediment pore water distribution coefficients (log Kd's) for both THg and MeHg were inversely related to the log-transformed ratio of pore water dissolved organic carbon (DOC) to bed sediment %fines. The stream with the highest drainage basin wetland density also had the highest pore water DOC concentration and the lowest log Kd's for both THg and MeHg. No significant relationship existed between overlying water MeHg concentrations and those in bed sediment or pore water, suggesting upstream sources of MeHg production may be more important than local streambed production as a driver of water column MeHg concentration in drainage basins that receive Hg inputs primarily from atmospheric sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19475941     DOI: 10.1021/es802698v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

Review 1.  Bioaccumulation syndrome: identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Keith H Nislow; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Assessment of mercury bioaccumulation within the pelagic food web of lakes in the western Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Kristofer R Rolfhus; Britt D Hall; Bruce A Monson; Michael J Paterson; Jeffrey D Jeremiason
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Mercury distribution in sediment along urban-rural gradient around Shanghai (China): implication for pollution history.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Ling Chen; Wei-Ling Shi; Li-Zao Liu; Yue Li; Xiang-Zhou Meng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Influence of a chlor-alkali superfund site on mercury bioaccumulation in periphyton and low-trophic level fauna.

Authors:  Kate L Buckman; Mark Marvin-DiPasquale; Vivien F Taylor; Ann Chalmers; Hannah J Broadley; Jennifer Agee; Brian P Jackson; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Reducing methylmercury accumulation in the food webs of San Francisco Bay and its local watersheds.

Authors:  J A Davis; R E Looker; D Yee; M Marvin-Di Pasquale; J L Grenier; C M Austin; L J McKee; B K Greenfield; R Brodberg; J D Blum
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Sediment-porewater partitioning, total sulfur, and methylmercury production in estuaries.

Authors:  Amina T Schartup; Prentiss H Balcom; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Thiol-Based Selective Extraction Assay to Comparatively Assess Bioavailable Mercury in Sediments.

Authors:  Jonathan L Ticknor; Katarzyna H Kucharzyk; Kaitlyn A Porter; Marc A Deshusses; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.907

8.  Effect of organic matter concentration and characteristics on mercury mobilization and methylmercury production at an abandoned mine site.

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Todd P Luxton; Brooks Stanfield; Austin Baldwin; JoAnn Holloway; John McKernan; Mark G Johnson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  How to overcome inter-electrode variability and instability to quantify dissolved oxygen, Fe(II), mn(II), and S(-II) in undisturbed soils and sediments using voltammetry.

Authors:  Aaron J Slowey; Mark Marvin-Dipasquale
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.737

10.  Shallow groundwater mercury supply in a Coastal Plain stream.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Celeste A Journey; Mark A Lowery; Mark E Brigham; Douglas A Burns; Daniel T Button; Francis H Chapelle; Michelle A Lutz; Mark C Marvin-Dipasquale; Karen Riva-Murray
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.