Literature DB >> 26240371

Essential role for polymerase specialization in cellular nonhomologous end joining.

John M Pryor1, Crystal A Waters1, Ana Aza2, Kenjiro Asagoshi1, Christina Strom1, Piotr A Mieczkowski3, Luis Blanco2, Dale A Ramsden4.   

Abstract

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repairs chromosome breaks and must remain effective in the face of extensive diversity in broken end structures. We show here that this flexibility is often reliant on the ability to direct DNA synthesis across strand breaks, and that polymerase (Pol) μ and Pol λ are the only mammalian DNA polymerases that have this activity. By systematically varying substrate in cells, we show each polymerase is uniquely proficient in different contexts. The templating nucleotide is also selected differently, with Pol μ using the unpaired base adjacent to the downstream 5' phosphate even when there are available template sites further upstream of this position; this makes Pol μ more flexible but also less accurate than Pol λ. Loss of either polymerase alone consequently has clear and distinguishable effects on the fidelity of repair, but end remodeling by cellular nucleases and the remaining polymerase helps mitigate the effects on overall repair efficiency. Accordingly, when cells are deficient in both polymerases there is synergistic impact on NHEJ efficiency, both in terms of repair of defined substrates and cellular resistance to ionizing radiation. Pol μ and Pol λ thus provide distinct solutions to a problem for DNA synthesis that is unique to this pathway and play a key role in conferring on NHEJ the flexibility required for accurate and efficient repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pol X; double-strand break repair; nonhomologous end joining; polymerase lambda; polymerase mu

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26240371      PMCID: PMC4547266          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505805112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Two novel human and mouse DNA polymerases of the polX family.

Authors:  S Aoufouchi; E Flatter; A Dahan; A Faili; B Bertocci; S Storck; F Delbos; L Cocea; N Gupta; J C Weill; C A Reynaud
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and repertoire development.

Authors:  C L Benedict; S Gilfillan; T H Thai; J F Kearney
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  A closed conformation for the Pol lambda catalytic cycle.

Authors:  Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Katarzyna Bebenek; Joseph M Krahn; Thomas A Kunkel; Lars C Pedersen
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2004-12-19       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  DNA joint dependence of pol X family polymerase action in nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  James M Daley; Renee L Vander Laan; Aswathi Suresh; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Jody M Havener; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Raquel Juárez; Katarzyna Bebenek; Barbara L Kee; Luis Blanco; Thomas A Kunkel; Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Crystal structures of a template-independent DNA polymerase: murine terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase.

Authors:  M Delarue; J B Boulé; J Lescar; N Expert-Bezançon; N Jourdan; N Sukumar; F Rougeon; C Papanicolaou
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  DNA polymerase mu (Pol mu), homologous to TdT, could act as a DNA mutator in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  O Domínguez; J F Ruiz; T Laín de Lera; M García-Díaz; M A González; T Kirchhoff; C Martínez-A; A Bernad; L Blanco
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Polymerase mu is up-regulated during the T cell-dependent immune response and its deficiency alters developmental dynamics of spleen centroblasts.

Authors:  Daniel Lucas; Teresa Laín de Lera; Manuel A González; Jose F Ruiz; Orlando Domínguez; Jesús C Casanova; Carlos Martínez-A; Luis Blanco; Antonio Bernad
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 9.  The role of double-strand break repair - insights from human genetics.

Authors:  Mark O'Driscoll; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  The DNA polymerase lambda is required for the repair of non-compatible DNA double strand breaks by NHEJ in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Capp; François Boudsocq; Pascale Bertrand; Audrey Laroche-Clary; Philippe Pourquier; Bernard S Lopez; Christophe Cazaux; Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann; Yvan Canitrot
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  39 in total

1.  Creative template-dependent synthesis by human polymerase mu.

Authors:  Andrea F Moon; Rajendrakumar A Gosavi; Thomas A Kunkel; Lars C Pedersen; Katarzyna Bebenek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structural evidence for an in trans base selection mechanism involving Loop1 in polymerase μ at an NHEJ double-strand break junction.

Authors:  Jérôme Loc'h; Christina A Gerodimos; Sandrine Rosario; Mustafa Tekpinar; Michael R Lieber; Marc Delarue
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Ribonucleotide incorporation enables repair of chromosome breaks by nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  John M Pryor; Michael P Conlin; Juan Carvajal-Garcia; Megan E Luedeman; Adam J Luthman; George W Small; Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Regulation of human polλ by ATM-mediated phosphorylation during non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Guillermo Sastre-Moreno; John M Pryor; Marta Moreno-Oñate; Andrés M Herrero-Ruiz; Felipe Cortés-Ledesma; Luis Blanco; Dale A Ramsden; Jose F Ruiz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-01-17

Review 5.  The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  Bailin Zhao; Eli Rothenberg; Dale A Ramsden; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Polymerase δ promotes chromosomal rearrangements and imprecise double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Jacob V Layer; Lydie Debaize; Alexandria Van Scoyk; Nealia C House; Alexander J Brown; Yunpeng Liu; Kristen E Stevenson; Michael Hemann; Steven A Roberts; Brendan D Price; David M Weinstock; Tovah A Day
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA Ligase IV Guides End-Processing Choice during Nonhomologous End Joining.

Authors:  Michael P Conlin; Dylan A Reid; George W Small; Howard H Chang; Go Watanabe; Michael R Lieber; Dale A Ramsden; Eli Rothenberg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Nicholas R Pannunzio; Go Watanabe; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Howard H Y Chang; Nicholas R Pannunzio; Noritaka Adachi; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Essential Roles for Polymerase θ-Mediated End Joining in the Repair of Chromosome Breaks.

Authors:  David W Wyatt; Wanjuan Feng; Michael P Conlin; Matthew J Yousefzadeh; Steven A Roberts; Piotr Mieczkowski; Richard D Wood; Gaorav P Gupta; Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.