Literature DB >> 26240364

Nectar vs. pollen loading affects the tradeoff between flight stability and maneuverability in bumblebees.

Andrew M Mountcastle1, Sridhar Ravi2, Stacey A Combes3.   

Abstract

Bumblebee foragers spend a significant portion of their lives transporting nectar and pollen, often carrying loads equivalent to more than half their body mass. Whereas nectar is stored in the abdomen near the bee's center of mass, pollen is carried on the hind legs, farther from the center of mass. We examine how load position changes the rotational moment of inertia in bumblebees and whether this affects their flight maneuverability and/or stability. We applied simulated pollen or nectar loads of equal mass to Bombus impatiens bumblebees and examined flight performance in a wind tunnel under three conditions: flight in unsteady flow, tracking an oscillating flower in smooth flow, and flower tracking in unsteady flow. Using an inertial model, we estimated that carrying a load on the legs rather than in the abdomen increases a bee's moment of inertia about the roll and yaw axes but not the pitch axis. Consistent with these predictions, we found that bees carrying a load on their legs displayed slower rotations about their roll and yaw axes, regardless of whether these rotations were driven by external perturbations or self-initiated steering maneuvers. This allowed pollen-loaded bees to maintain a more stable body orientation and higher median flight speed in unsteady flow but reduced their performance when tracking a moving flower, supporting the concept of a tradeoff between stability and maneuverability. These results demonstrate that the types of resources collected by bees affect their flight performance and energetics and suggest that wind conditions may influence resource selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; energetics; foraging; insect; turbulence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26240364      PMCID: PMC4547240          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1506126112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Wingbeat time and the scaling of passive rotational damping in flapping flight.

Authors:  Tyson L Hedrick; Bo Cheng; Xinyan Deng
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mechanisms and implications of animal flight maneuverability.

Authors:  Robert Dudley
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  The Kármán gait: novel body kinematics of rainbow trout swimming in a vortex street.

Authors:  James C Liao; David N Beal; George V Lauder; Michael S Triantafyllou
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Changes in the metabolic rate of the foraging honeybee: effect of the carried weight or of the reward rate?

Authors:  L Moffatt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Erica Feuerbacher; Jennifer H Fewell; Stephen P Roberts; Elizabeth F Smith; Jon F Harrison
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Mutually opposing forces during locomotion can eliminate the tradeoff between maneuverability and stability.

Authors:  Shahin Sefati; Izaak D Neveln; Eatai Roth; Terence R T Mitchell; James B Snyder; Malcolm A Maciver; Eric S Fortune; Noah J Cowan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Turbulence-driven instabilities limit insect flight performance.

Authors:  Stacey A Combes; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Metabolic rate during foraging in the honeybee.

Authors:  N M Balderrama; L O Almeida; J A Núñez
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.200

9.  Rolling with the flow: bumblebees flying in unsteady wakes.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; James D Crall; Alex Fisher; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Kinematic strategies for mitigating gust perturbations in insects.

Authors:  J T Vance; I Faruque; J S Humbert
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.956

View more
  5 in total

1.  Wind drives temporal variation in pollinator visitation in a fragmented tropical forest.

Authors:  James D Crall; Julia Brokaw; Susan F Gagliardi; Chase D Mendenhall; Naomi E Pierce; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Flight-Fecundity Trade-offs: A Possible Mechanistic Link in Plant-Herbivore-Pollinator Systems.

Authors:  Goggy Davidowitz; Judith L Bronstein; Natasha Tigreros
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Advantage of straight walk instability in turning maneuver of multilegged locomotion: a robotics approach.

Authors:  Shinya Aoi; Takahiro Tanaka; Soichiro Fujiki; Tetsuro Funato; Kei Senda; Kazuo Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Bumblebees minimize control challenges by combining active and passive modes in unsteady winds.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Thomas Engels; Kai Schneider; Chun Wang; Jörn Sesterhenn; Hao Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Wing Coupling in Bees and Wasps: From the Underlying Science to Bioinspired Engineering.

Authors:  Sepehr H Eraghi; Arman Toofani; Ali Khaheshi; Mohammad Khorsandi; Abolfazl Darvizeh; Stanislav Gorb; Hamed Rajabi
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 16.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.