Literature DB >> 24031057

Rolling with the flow: bumblebees flying in unsteady wakes.

Sridhar Ravi1, James D Crall, Alex Fisher, Stacey A Combes.   

Abstract

Our understanding of how variable wind in natural environments affects flying insects is limited because most studies of insect flight are conducted in either smooth flow or still air conditions. Here, we investigate the effects of structured, unsteady flow (the von Karman vortex street behind a cylinder) on the flight performance of bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). Bumblebees are 'all-weather' foragers and thus frequently experience variable aerial conditions, ranging from fully mixed, turbulent flow to unsteady, structured vortices near objects such as branches and stems. We examined how bumblebee flight performance differs in unsteady versus smooth flow, as well as how the orientation of unsteady flow structures affects their flight performance, by filming bumblebees flying in a wind tunnel under various flow conditions. The three-dimensional flight trajectories and orientations of bumblebees were quantified in each of three flow conditions: (1) smooth flow, (2) the unsteady wake of a vertical cylinder (inducing strong lateral disturbances) and (3) the unsteady wake of a horizontal cylinder (inducing strong vertical disturbances). In both unsteady conditions, bumblebees attenuated the disturbances induced by the wind quite effectively, but still experienced significant translational and rotational fluctuations as compared with flight in smooth flow. Bees appeared to be most sensitive to disturbance along the lateral axis, displaying large lateral accelerations, translations and rolling motions in response to both unsteady flow conditions, regardless of orientation. Bees also displayed the greatest agility around the roll axis, initiating voluntary casting maneuvers and correcting for lateral disturbances mainly through roll in all flow conditions. Both unsteady flow conditions reduced the upstream flight speed of bees, suggesting an increased cost of flight in unsteady flow, with potential implications for foraging patterns and colony energetics in natural, variable wind environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bumblebee flight; flight stability; turbulence; unsteady flows; von Karman street

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24031057     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.090845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

1.  Nectar vs. pollen loading affects the tradeoff between flight stability and maneuverability in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Sridhar Ravi; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Controlling roll perturbations in fruit flies.

Authors:  Tsevi Beatus; John M Guckenheimer; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Adaptive control of turbulence intensity is accelerated by frugal flow sampling.

Authors:  Daniel B Quinn; Yous van Halder; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Wind drives temporal variation in pollinator visitation in a fragmented tropical forest.

Authors:  James D Crall; Julia Brokaw; Susan F Gagliardi; Chase D Mendenhall; Naomi E Pierce; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Foraging in an unsteady world: bumblebee flight performance in field-realistic turbulence.

Authors:  J D Crall; J J Chang; R L Oppenheimer; S A Combes
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Living in a trash can: turbulent convective flows impair Drosophila flight performance.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Ortega-Jiménez; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Insect and insect-inspired aerodynamics: unsteadiness, structural mechanics and flight control.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Ramiro Godoy-Diana
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.186

10.  BEEtag: A Low-Cost, Image-Based Tracking System for the Study of Animal Behavior and Locomotion.

Authors:  James D Crall; Nick Gravish; Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.