Literature DB >> 23302326

Kinematic strategies for mitigating gust perturbations in insects.

J T Vance1, I Faruque, J S Humbert.   

Abstract

Insects are attractive models for the development of micro-aerial vehicles (MAVs) due to their relatively simple sensing, actuation and control architectures as compared to vertebrates, and because of their robust flight ability in dynamic and heterogeneous environments, characterized by turbulence and gusts of wind. How do insects respond to gust perturbations? We investigated this question by perturbing freely-flying honey bees and stalk-eye flies with low-pressure bursts of compressed air to simulate a wind gust. Body and wing kinematics were analyzed from flight sequences, recorded using three high-speed digital video cameras. Bees quickly responded to body rotations caused by gusts through bilateral asymmetry in stroke amplitude, whereas stalk-eye flies used a combination of asymmetric stroke amplitude and wing rotation angle. Both insects coordinated asymmetric and symmetric kinematics in response to gusts, which provides model strategies for simple yet robust flight characteristics for MAVs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23302326     DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/8/1/016004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim        ISSN: 1748-3182            Impact factor:   2.956


  13 in total

1.  Nectar vs. pollen loading affects the tradeoff between flight stability and maneuverability in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Sridhar Ravi; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Controlling roll perturbations in fruit flies.

Authors:  Tsevi Beatus; John M Guckenheimer; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  Foraging in an unsteady world: bumblebee flight performance in field-realistic turbulence.

Authors:  J D Crall; J J Chang; R L Oppenheimer; S A Combes
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  An insect-inspired collapsible wing hinge dampens collision-induced body rotation rates in a microrobot.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; E Farrell Helbling; Robert J Wood
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Living in a trash can: turbulent convective flows impair Drosophila flight performance.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Ortega-Jiménez; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Insect and insect-inspired aerodynamics: unsteadiness, structural mechanics and flight control.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Ramiro Godoy-Diana
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.186

9.  Active and passive stabilization of body pitch in insect flight.

Authors:  Leif Ristroph; Gunnar Ristroph; Svetlana Morozova; Attila J Bergou; Song Chang; John Guckenheimer; Z Jane Wang; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Bumblebees minimize control challenges by combining active and passive modes in unsteady winds.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Thomas Engels; Kai Schneider; Chun Wang; Jörn Sesterhenn; Hao Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.