Literature DB >> 21708702

Mechanisms and implications of animal flight maneuverability.

Robert Dudley1.   

Abstract

Accelerations and directional changes of flying animals derive from interactions between aerodynamic force production and the inertial resistance of the body to translation and rotation. Anatomical and allometric features of body design thus mediate the rapidity of aerial maneuvers. Both translational and rotational responsiveness of the body to applied force decrease with increased total mass. For flying vertebrates, contributions of the relatively heavy wings to whole-body rotational inertia are substantial, whereas the relatively light wings of many insect taxa suggest that rotational inertia is dominated by the contributions of body segments. In some circumstances, inertial features of wing design may be as significant as are their aerodynamic properties in influencing the rapidity of body rotations. Stability in flight requires force and moment balances that are usually attained via bilateral symmetry in wingbeat kinematics, whereas body roll and yaw derive from bilaterally asymmetric movements of both axial and appendicular structures. In many flying vertebrates, use of the tail facilitates the generation of aerodynamic torques and substantially enhances quickness of body rotation. Geometrical constraints on wingbeat kinematics may limit total force production and thus accelerational capacity in certain behavioral circumstances. Unitary limits to animal flight performance and maneuverability are unlikely, however, given varied and context-specific interactions among anatomical, biomechanical, and energetic features of design.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 21708702     DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.1.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  26 in total

Review 1.  The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-03-04

2.  A passerine spreads its tail to facilitate a rapid recovery of its body posture during hovering.

Authors:  Jian-Yuan Su; Shang-Chieh Ting; Yu-Hung Chang; Jing-Tang Yang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Nectar vs. pollen loading affects the tradeoff between flight stability and maneuverability in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Sridhar Ravi; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Jillian D Wormington; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Evol Ecol Res       Date:  2014

5.  Into turbulent air: size-dependent effects of von Kármán vortex streets on hummingbird flight kinematics and energetics.

Authors:  Victor M Ortega-Jimenez; Nir Sapir; Marta Wolf; Evan A Variano; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Wing wear reduces bumblebee flight performance in a dynamic obstacle course.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Teressa M Alexander; Callin M Switzer; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Free flight maneuvers of stalk-eyed flies: do eye-stalks affect aerial turning behavior?

Authors:  Gal Ribak; John G Swallow
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Explaining the effects of floral density on flower visitor species composition.

Authors:  Carla J Essenberg
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Acoustic startle/escape reactions in tethered flying locusts: motor patterns and wing kinematics underlying intentional steering.

Authors:  J W Dawson; F-H Leung; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.