Literature DB >> 26238003

Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Carolyn M Hettrich1, Vijay N Permeswaran2, Jessica E Goetz2, Donald D Anderson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid.
METHODS: Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm.
RESULTS: Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement.
CONCLUSION: Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenospere lateralization; deltoid force; finite element analysis; impingement; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; scapular notching

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238003     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  13 in total

1.  Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Kevin Chan; G Daniel G Langohr; Matthew Mahaffy; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The Influence of Different Rotator Cuff Deficiencies on Shoulder Stability Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea P Caceres; Vijay N Permeswaran; Jessica E Goetz; Carolyn M Hettrich; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

5.  Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; Joseph Choi; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

7.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty glenoid lateralization influences scapular spine strains.

Authors:  Alicia M Kerrigan; Jake Reeves; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-02

8.  Maximizing range of motion of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using design optimization techniques.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; George Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  The effect of metaglene lateralization on joint mobility of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Stephanie Kahmann; Michael Hackl; Stephan Uschok; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.