Literature DB >> 34804210

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty glenoid lateralization influences scapular spine strains.

Alicia M Kerrigan1, Jake Reeves1, G Daniel G Langohr1, James A Johnson1, George S Athwal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scapular spine insufficiency fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty are poorly understood. There exists limited literature regarding the role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty lateralization on scapular spine strains and fractures. The purpose of this cadaveric biomechanical simulator study was to evaluate the role of glenoid lateralization on scapular spine strain.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested using an in-vitro simulator. A custom modular reverse shoulder arthroplasty was implanted that allowed for in-situ glenoid lateralization adjustment. Scapular spine strain was measured by strain gauges placed in clinically relevant Levy zones along the scapular spine. All specimens were tested in loaded forward elevation and abduction.
RESULTS: Glenoid lateralization from 0 to 5 mm caused negligible changes in scapular spine strains. Lateralization from 5 to 10 mm, however, caused significant increases in strain at 0° forward elevation in all strain gauges (p < 0.026). Strains measured in Levy zone 2 were significantly higher than all other locations (p < 0.039). Additionally, forward elevation resulted in significantly higher strain values than abduction (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Glenoid lateralization is an important parameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty; however, our results demonstrate higher degrees of lateralization may place higher strains on the scapular spine. An understanding of reverse shoulder arthroplasty lateralization and scapular spine strains is important to optimize parameters and to mitigate negative effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Sciences Study, Cadaveric Model, Biomechanics.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromial fracture; complications; cuff tear arthropathy; glenoid lateralization; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; scapular spine strain

Year:  2020        PMID: 34804210      PMCID: PMC8600669          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220935567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  36 in total

1.  Effect of lateral offset center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Heath B Henninger; Alexej Barg; Andrew E Anderson; Kent N Bachus; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. 1944.

Authors:  V T Inman; J B Saunders; L C Abbott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion.

Authors:  G Daniel G Langohr; Joshua W Giles; George S Athwal; James A Johnson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Effect of lateralized design on muscle and joint reaction forces for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  William Liou; Yang Yang; Graysen R Petersen-Fitts; Daniel J Lombardo; Sasha Stine; Vani J Sabesan
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Muscle and joint-contact loading at the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Sasha Roshan-Zamir; Martin Richardson; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: the clinical effect of deltoid lengthening and center of rotation medialization.

Authors:  Charles M Jobin; Gabriel D Brown; Maher J Bahu; Thomas R Gardner; Louis U Bigliani; William N Levine; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements.

Authors:  J Y Rho; R B Ashman; C H Turner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello; Steven Siegal; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Classification of postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Christopher Anderson; Anil Samson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has an impact on acromial stresses.

Authors:  Murray T Wong; G Daniel G Langohr; George S Athwal; James A Johnson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.