Literature DB >> 33679021

The effect of metaglene lateralization on joint mobility of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Nadine Ott1, Stephanie Kahmann1, Michael Hackl1, Stephan Uschok1, Lars Peter Müller1, Kilian Wegmann1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lateralization of the metaglene reduces scapular notching or impingement. However, the effect on joint mobility remains unclear. With increased attention to reverse shoulder arthroplasty over the past years, the aim of this biomechanical study is to analyze the effect of metaglene lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (DeltaXtend; Fa. Depuy/Synthes) was performed in 7 cadaveric shoulders. Lateralization of the metaglene was performed in increments, using spacers of +0 mm (subgroup I), +5 mm (subgroup II), +10 mm (subgroup III). Deltoid muscle (pars clavicularis, acromialis and spinalis), teres minor (TMI), infraspinatus (IF) and subscapularis muslces (SSC) were loaded separately. Range of motion was measured by using a motion capture system (Optotrak Certus) in the sagittal plane (z-axis), coronar plane (x-axis) and transversal plane (y-axis). A custom-made biomechanical test set up was used to test the samples with a constant preload with additional testing load up to 4 kg on each muscle.
RESULTS: Specimens showed a tendency towards increased range of motion in abduction (deltoid, pars acromialis), external rotation (IS/TMI) and internal rotation (SSC) in subgroup II, compared to subgroups I and III, without reaching the level of significance Abduction at maximum used load was 46° (subgroup I), 62° (subgroup II) and 22° (subgroup III). The mean external rotation (ISF) at maximum used load was 25° (I), 28° (II) and 24° (III). Mean internal rotation was 22° (subgroup I), 48° (subgroup II) and 26° (subgroup III).
CONCLUSION: Moderate lateralization of the glenosphere of +5 mm has improved the range of motion in our experimental cadaveric setup. Especially a higher internal and external rotation can be reached with less load.Level of evidence III.
© 2021 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Lateralization; Metaglene; Range of motion; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679021      PMCID: PMC7898071          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  24 in total

1.  Effect of lateral offset center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Heath B Henninger; Alexej Barg; Andrew E Anderson; Kent N Bachus; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  The classic: Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. 1993.

Authors:  Paul M Grammont; Emmanuel Baulot
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Nicolas Morin-Salvo; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Brian L Seeto; Peter N Chalmers; Nicolas Holzer; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua K Helmkamp; Garrett S Bullock; Nnamdi R Amilo; Evan M Guerrero; Leila S Ledbetter; Timothy C Sell; Grant E Garrigues
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Manuel Ferle; Marc-Frederic Pastor; Jakob Hagenah; Christof Hurschler; Tomas Smith
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty component center of rotation affects muscle function.

Authors:  Heinz R Hoenecke; Cesar Flores-Hernandez; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is larger better for external rotation and abduction strength?

Authors:  Andreas M Müller; Marian Born; Christian Jung; Matthias Flury; Christoph Kolling; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

9.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Pascal Boileau; Luc Favard; Pascal Garaud; Daniel Molé; François Sirveaux; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 10.  Influence of Glenosphere Design on Outcomes and Complications of Reverse Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cassandra Lawrence; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  CT versus MRI planning for reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Colton J Bohonos; Shane P Russell; David I Morrissey
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-14

2.  Similar optimal distalization and lateralization angles can be achieved with different reverse shoulder arthroplasty implant designs.

Authors:  Michael Marsalli; Juan De Dios Errázuriz; Marco A Cartaya; Joaquín De La Paz; Diego N Fritis; Pedro I Alsúa; Nicolas I Morán; José T Rojas
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.