Literature DB >> 32778382

Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Robert Z Tashjian1, Bradley Hillyard1, Victoria Childress1, Jun Kawakami1, Angela P Presson2, Chong Zhang2, Peter N Chalmers3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors associated with outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all RTSAs performed by the senior author between January 1, 2007, and November 1, 2017. We evaluated pain visual analog scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores and complication and reoperation rates at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. We evaluated preoperative and 2-week postoperative radiographs for glenoid inclination (GI), medialization as distance between the center of the humeral head or glenosphere and the line of the deltoid, and distalization via the acromial-greater tuberosity distance. We performed inter- and intrarater reliabilities via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and conducted a multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: We included 230 RTSAs in the analysis, with 70% follow-up at a median of 3.4 years. Reliability was acceptable with all ICCs >.678. Increased postoperative GI was significantly associated with increased VAS pain postoperatively (P = .008). Increased distalization was associated with an increased rate of complications and reoperations (P = .032). Younger age (P = .008), female gender (P = .009), and lower body mass index (BMI) (P = .006) were associated with worse ASES scores. Female gender (P < .001) and lower BMI (P = .039) were associated with worse SST scores. Female gender (P = .013) and lower BMI (P = .005) were associated with worse VAS-pain scores.
CONCLUSION: Age, gender, and BMI are associated with outcome after RTSA. In this retrospective analysis of a Grammont-style RTSA, superior inclination is associated with increased pain postoperatively, whereas excessive arm lengthening is associated with increased risk for complication or reoperation.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; lateralization; medical comorbidities; patient-reported outcomes; radiographic analysis; shoulder replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32778382      PMCID: PMC7726007          DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  48 in total

1.  Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.

Authors:  Eric Vittinghoff; Charles E McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Gerber; Scott D Pennington; Richard W Nyffeler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Do younger patients have better results after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Michael P Leathers; Marc N Ialenti; Brian T Feeley; Alan L Zhang; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Manuel Ferle; Marc-Frederic Pastor; Jakob Hagenah; Christof Hurschler; Tomas Smith
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Morbidity during hospitalization: can we predict it?

Authors:  M E Charlson; F L Sax; C R MacKenzie; R L Braham; S D Fields; R G Douglas
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Does prosthetic humeral articular surface positioning associate with outcome after total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Erin K Granger; Nathan D Orvets; Brendan M Patterson; Aaron M Chamberlain; Jay D Keener; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello; Steven Siegal; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Predicting outstanding results after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using percentage of maximal outcome improvement.

Authors:  Paul DeVito; Dhanur Damodar; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Ellie A Moeller; M Russell Giveans; Brandon Horn; Andy Malarkey; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  The lateralization and distalization shoulder angles are important determinants of clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Achilleas Boutsiadis; Hubert Lenoir; Patrick J Denard; Jean-Claude Panisset; Paul Brossard; Philippe Delsol; Frédéric Guichard; Johannes Barth
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Effect of preoperative patient expectations on outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan C Rauck; Ishaan Swarup; Brenda Chang; David M Dines; Russell F Warren; Lawrence V Gulotta; R Frank Henn
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  2 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Improved Clinical Outcomes After Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Winston J Warme
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased symptomatic acromial and scapular spine stress fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matt Miller; Peter N Chalmers; Jacob Nyfeler; Luke Mhyre; Cade Wheelwright; Kristin Konery; Jun Kawakami; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.