Literature DB >> 26233621

A cost-effective surgical navigation solution for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery.

Silvio Pflugi1, Li Liu2, Timo M Ecker3, Steffen Schumann4, Jennifer Larissa Cullmann5, Klaus Siebenrock6, Guoyan Zheng7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a low-cost, inertial sensor-based surgical navigation solution for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery without the line-of-sight impediment.
METHODS: Two commercial inertial measurement units (IMU, Xsens Technologies, The Netherlands), are attached to a patient's pelvis and to the acetabular fragment, respectively. Registration of the patient with a pre-operatively acquired computer model is done by recording the orientation of the patient's anterior pelvic plane (APP) using one IMU. A custom-designed device is used to record the orientation of the APP in the reference coordinate system of the IMU. After registration, the two sensors are mounted to the patient's pelvis and acetabular fragment, respectively. Once the initial position is recorded, the orientation is measured and displayed on a computer screen. A patient-specific computer model generated from a pre-operatively acquired computed tomography scan is used to visualize the updated orientation of the acetabular fragment.
RESULTS: Experiments with plastic bones (eight hip joints) performed in an operating room comparing a previously developed optical navigation system with our inertial-based navigation system showed no statistically significant difference on the measurement of acetabular component reorientation. In all eight hip joints the mean absolute difference was below four degrees.
CONCLUSION: Using two commercially available inertial measurement units we show that it is possible to accurately measure the orientation (inclination and anteversion) of the acetabular fragment during PAO surgery and therefore to successfully eliminate the line-of-sight impediment that optical navigation systems have.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted surgery; Inertial measurement unit; Navigation system; PAO surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233621     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1267-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  18 in total

Review 1.  Rationale of osteotomy and related procedures for hip preservation: a review.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Computer-assisted periacetabular triple osteotomy for treatment of dysplasia of the hip].

Authors:  M Jäger; B Westhoff; A Wild; R Krauspe
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

3.  An inertial and magnetic sensor based technique for joint angle measurement.

Authors:  Karol J O'Donovan; Roman Kamnik; Derek T O'Keeffe; Gerard M Lyons
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Accuracy of computer navigation for acetabular component placement in THA.

Authors:  James A Ryan; Amir A Jamali; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies.

Authors:  F Langlotz; R Bächler; U Berlemann; L P Nolte; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  How does soft tissue distribution affect anteversion accuracy of the palpation procedure in image-free acetabular cup navigation? An ultrasonographic assessment.

Authors:  Jens A Richolt; Harald Effenberger; Markus E Rittmeister
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2005-03

7.  Multisensor data fusion in an integrated tracking system for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Hongliang Ren; Denis Rank; Martin Merdes; Jan Stallkamp; Peter Kazanzides
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2011-08-08

8.  The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  F Langlotz; M Stucki; R Bächler; C Scheer; R Ganz; U Berlemann; L P Nolte
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1997

9.  Computer assisted planning and navigation of periacetabular osteotomy with range of motion optimization.

Authors:  Li Liu; Timo Ecker; Steffen Schumann; Klaus Siebenrock; Lutz Nolte; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

10.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03
View more
  9 in total

1.  An Accurate Recognition of Infrared Retro-Reflective Markers in Surgical Navigation.

Authors:  Han Wu; Qinyong Lin; Rongqian Yang; Yuan Zhou; Lingxiang Zheng; Yueshan Huang; Zhigang Wang; Yonghua Lao; Jinhua Huang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Augmented marker tracking for peri-acetabular osteotomy surgery.

Authors:  Silvio Pflugi; Rakesh Vasireddy; Till Lerch; Timo M Ecker; Moritz Tannast; Nane Boemke; Klaus Siebenrock; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Computer-assisted surgery prevents complications during peri-acetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Nao Shibanuma; Kazunari Ishida; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Error range in proximal femoral osteotomy using computer tomography-based navigation.

Authors:  Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Hidetoshi Hamada; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Comparison of rotational acetabular osteotomy performed with navigation by surgeons with different levels of experience of osteotomies.

Authors:  Masaki Takao; Takashi Nishii; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  [Development and clinical application of robot-assisted technology in traumatic orthopedics].

Authors:  Zhenzhong Zhu; Guoyan Zheng; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 7.  Preoperative planning for redirective, periacetabular osteotomies.

Authors:  Christoph E Albers; Piet Rogers; Nicholas Wambeek; Sufian S Ahmad; Piers J Yates; Gareth H Prosser
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2017-09-14

8.  Three-dimensional acetabular orientation during periacetabular osteotomy: a video analysis of acetabular rim position using an external fixator as navigation tool during reorientation procedure.

Authors:  Timo J Schwarz; Günther Maderbacher; Franziska Leiss; Joachim Grifka; G Heers; J Matussek
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery: Current State and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Guoyan Zheng; Lutz P Nolte
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-12-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.