Literature DB >> 28365906

Error range in proximal femoral osteotomy using computer tomography-based navigation.

Masaki Takao1, Takashi Sakai2, Hidetoshi Hamada2, Nobuhiko Sugano3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE  : The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine the error range compared with preoperative plans in proximal femoral osteotomy conducted using a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system. METHODS  : Four patients (four hips) underwent transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO), and three patients (four hips) underwent curved varus osteotomy (CVO) using CT-based navigation. Volume registration of pre- and postoperative CT was performed for error assessment. RESULTS  : In TRO, the mean osteotomy angle error was [Formula: see text] (range [Formula: see text]) in the valgus direction and [Formula: see text] (range [Formula: see text]) in the retroversion direction. The mean osteotomy position error, with the femoral head side as positive, was -0.4 mm (range -1.4 to 0 mm). The bone fragment rotational movement error was [Formula: see text] (range [Formula: see text]). In CVO, the mean osteotomy position error, with the femoral head side as positive, was -0.2 mm (range -2.0 to 1.7 mm) at the level of the lesser trochanter and 0.8 mm (range 0-3.2 mm) at the level of the greater trochanter. Bone fragment varus accuracy was [Formula: see text] (range [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS  : In proximal femoral osteotomy using CT-based navigation, the angle error of osteotomy was within [Formula: see text] and the positional error was within 4 mm. The rotational movement error of the proximal fragment was within [Formula: see text]. These margins of error should be considered in preoperative planning. To improve surgical accuracy, it would be necessary to develop a computer-assisted device which can track the osteotomized fragment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Computed tomography; Navigation; Proximal femoral osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28365906     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1577-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  42 in total

1.  Safety of computer-assisted surgery for cannulated hip screws.

Authors:  H K M Hamelinck; M Haagmans; M M Snoeren; J Biert; A B van Vugt; J P M Frölke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy.

Authors:  C Schnurr; J W P Michael; P Eysel; D P König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A laboratory comparison of computer navigation and individualized guides for distal radius osteotomy.

Authors:  Burton Ma; Manuela Kunz; Braden Gammon; Randy E Ellis; David R Pichora
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies.

Authors:  F Langlotz; R Bächler; U Berlemann; L P Nolte; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Computerized navigation for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Meir Liebergall; Dror Ben-David; Yoram Weil; Amos Peyser; Rami Mosheiff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Patient-specific instrument can achieve same accuracy with less resection time than navigation assistance in periacetabular pelvic tumor surgery: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Kwok-Chuen Wong; Kwan-Yik Sze; Irene Oi-Ling Wong; Chung-Ming Wong; Shekhar-Madhukar Kumta
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  MR findings of necrotic lesions and the extralesional area of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  T Sakai; N Sugano; T Nishii; K Haraguchi; T Ochi; K Ohzono
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The degrees to which transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy moves the region of osteonecrotic femoral head out of the weight-bearing area as evaluated by computer simulation.

Authors:  Weng-Pin Chen; Ching-Lung Tai; Chih-Feng Tan; Chun-Hsiung Shih; Shun-Hsin Hou; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Posterior rotational osteotomy for nontraumatic osteonecrosis with extensive collapsed lesions in young patients.

Authors:  Takashi Atsumi; Toshihisa Kajiwara; Yasunari Hiranuma; Satoshi Tamaoki; Yasuhiro Asakura
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Rotational osteotomy for non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  N Sugano; K Takaoka; K Ohzono; M Matsui; M Saito; S Saito
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery-current status and introduction of our system.

Authors:  Klemen Stražar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Value of virtual reality technology in preoperative planning of transtrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for avascular necrosis of femoral head in adults].

Authors:  Le Shi; Yanxin Fan; Chao Zhang; Jirong Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.