Literature DB >> 20689026

Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: evidence from eye movements.

Boaz M Ben-David1, Craig G Chambers, Meredyth Daneman, M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, Eyal M Reingold, Bruce A Schneider.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use eye tracking to investigate age differences in real-time lexical processing in quiet and in noise in light of the fact that older adults find it more difficult than younger adults to understand conversations in noisy situations.
METHOD: Twenty-four younger and 24 older adults followed spoken instructions referring to depicted objects, for example, "Look at the candle." Eye movements captured listeners' ability to differentiate the target noun (candle) from a similar-sounding phonological competitor (e.g., candy or sandal). Manipulations included the presence/absence of noise, the type of phonological overlap in target-competitor pairs, and the number of syllables.
RESULTS: Having controlled for age-related differences in word recognition accuracy (by tailoring noise levels), similar online processing profiles were found for younger and older adults when targets were discriminated from competitors that shared onset sounds. Age-related differences were found when target words were differentiated from rhyming competitors and were more extensive in noise.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time spoken word recognition processes appear similar for younger and older adults in most conditions; however, age-related differences may be found in the discrimination of rhyming words (especially in noise), even when there are no age differences in word recognition accuracy. These results highlight the utility of eye movement methodologies for studying speech processing across the life span.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689026     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0233)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  36 in total

1.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  THE INFLUENCE OF NOISE ON PHONOLOGICAL COMPETITION DURING SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Proc Int Congr Phon Sci       Date:  2011

3.  Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The effect of lexical frequency on spoken word recognition in young and older listeners.

Authors:  Kathleen Pirog Revill; Daniel H Spieler
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-06-27

5.  Perceptual gap detection is mediated by gap termination responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Aldis P Weible; Alexandra K Moore; Christine Liu; Leah DeBlander; Haiyan Wu; Clifford Kentros; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-14

7.  Competing speech perception in older and younger adults: behavioral and eye-movement evidence.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Adrian Staub
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Gap encoding by parvalbumin-expressing interneurons in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Katherine Kaylegian; Michael Wehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Card playing enhances speech perception among aging adults: comparison with aging musicians.

Authors:  Leah Fostick
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2019-04-13

10.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.