Literature DB >> 26233011

Auditory attention strategy depends on target linguistic properties and spatial configuration.

Daniel R McCloy1, Adrian K C Lee1.   

Abstract

Whether crossing a busy intersection or attending a large dinner party, listeners sometimes need to attend to multiple spatially distributed sound sources or streams concurrently. How they achieve this is not clear-some studies suggest that listeners cannot truly simultaneously attend to separate streams, but instead combine attention switching with short-term memory to achieve something resembling divided attention. This paper presents two oddball detection experiments designed to investigate whether directing attention to phonetic versus semantic properties of the attended speech impacts listeners' ability to divide their auditory attention across spatial locations. Each experiment uses four spatially distinct streams of monosyllabic words, variation in cue type (providing phonetic or semantic information), and requiring attention to one or two locations. A rapid button-press response paradigm is employed to minimize the role of short-term memory in performing the task. Results show that differences in the spatial configuration of attended and unattended streams interact with linguistic properties of the speech streams to impact performance. Additionally, listeners may leverage phonetic information to make oddball detection judgments even when oddballs are semantically defined. Both of these effects appear to be mediated by the overall complexity of the acoustic scene.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233011      PMCID: PMC4499044          DOI: 10.1121/1.4922328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Isolating exogenous and endogenous modes of temporal attention.

Authors:  Michael A Lawrence; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-07-02

2.  Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.

Authors:  Nandini Iyer; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Norbert Kopco; Tara J Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

5.  Analyzing recognition performance with sparse data.

Authors:  Ching-Fan Sheu; Yuh-Shiow Lee; Pei-Ying Shih
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

6.  Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07

7.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953).

Authors:  N L Wood; N Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1995-09

8.  Is there implicit memory without attention? A reexamination of task demands in Eich's (1984) procedure.

Authors:  N L Wood; M A Stadler; N Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

9.  Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Bonnie K Lau; Eric Larson; Katherine A I Pratt; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory attention switching with listening difficulty: Behavioral and pupillometric measures.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.

Authors:  Wusheng Liang; Christopher A Brown; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.