Literature DB >> 28464660

Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.

Daniel R McCloy1, Bonnie K Lau1, Eric Larson1, Katherine A I Pratt1, Adrian K C Lee1.   

Abstract

Successful speech communication often requires selective attention to a target stream amidst competing sounds, as well as the ability to switch attention among multiple interlocutors. However, auditory attention switching negatively affects both target detection accuracy and reaction time, suggesting that attention switches carry a cognitive cost. Pupillometry is one method of assessing mental effort or cognitive load. Two experiments were conducted to determine whether the effort associated with attention switches is detectable in the pupillary response. In both experiments, pupil dilation, target detection sensitivity, and reaction time were measured; the task required listeners to either maintain or switch attention between two concurrent speech streams. Secondary manipulations explored whether switch-related effort would increase when auditory streaming was harder. In experiment 1, spatially distinct stimuli were degraded by simulating reverberation (compromising across-time streaming cues), and target-masker talker gender match was also varied. In experiment 2, diotic streams separable by talker voice quality and pitch were degraded by noise vocoding, and the time alloted for mid-trial attention switching was varied. All trial manipulations had some effect on target detection sensitivity and/or reaction time; however, only the attention-switching manipulation affected the pupillary response: greater dilation was observed in trials requiring switching attention between talkers.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464660      PMCID: PMC5848839          DOI: 10.1121/1.4979340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving.

Authors:  E H Hess; J M Polt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Analyzing recognition performance with sparse data.

Authors:  Ching-Fan Sheu; Yuh-Shiow Lee; Pei-Ying Shih
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

4.  Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.

Authors:  J Beatty
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Pupillary response to auditory versus visual mental loading: a pilot study using super 8-mm photography.

Authors:  J S Taylor
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1981-04

8.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group 'white paper'.

Authors:  Ronan McGarrigle; Kevin J Munro; Piers Dawes; Andrew J Stewart; David R Moore; Johanna G Barry; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Processing load induced by informational masking is related to linguistic abilities.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Joost M Festen; Jerker Rönnberg; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-03
View more
  12 in total

1.  Neural Switch Asymmetry in Feature-Based Auditory Attention Tasks.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-23

Review 2.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory attention switching with listening difficulty: Behavioral and pupillometric measures.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Auditory Attention Deployment in Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Katherine A Emmons; Adrian Kc Lee; Annette Estes; Stephen Dager; Eric Larson; Daniel R McCloy; Tanya St John; Bonnie K Lau
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 7.  Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Dorothea Wendt; Thomas Koelewijn; Stefanie E Kuchinsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  The Effects of Switching Non-Spatial Attention During Conversational Turn Taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cortical modulation of pupillary function: systematic review.

Authors:  Costanza Peinkhofer; Daniel Kondziella; Gitte M Knudsen; Rita Moretti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.