Literature DB >> 7673862

The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953).

N L Wood1, N Cowan.   

Abstract

Though E. C. Cherry (1953) examined the recall of information from an irrelevant spoken channel in selective listening, the relationship between attention and subsequent recall still has not been examined adequately. It was examined here in 4 experiments, 3 of which were designed to identify conditions under which some participants, but not others, would notice a change from forward to backward speech. Only participants who shifted attention toward the irrelevant channel during the backward speech later recalled hearing it. In those whose attention shifted, shadowing errors peaked dramatically about 15 s after the change. There was no evidence of direct or indirect memory for phrases presented in the irrelevant channel. The results contradict models of attention stating that listeners process task-irrelevant information extensively without diverting resources used in shadowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673862     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.3.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  30 in total

1.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.

Authors:  A R Conway; N Cowan; M F Bunting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory attention strategy depends on target linguistic properties and spatial configuration.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.

Authors:  Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Attentional and linguistic interactions in speech perception.

Authors:  Merav Sabri; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik Desai; David A Medler; Michael D Leitl; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Auditory distractor processing in sequential selection tasks.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Birte Moeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-21

7.  Inattentional deafness in music.

Authors:  Sabrina Koreimann; Bartosz Gula; Oliver Vitouch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-21

8.  Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Megan K Lewis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Is there implicit memory without attention? A reexamination of task demands in Eich's (1984) procedure.

Authors:  N L Wood; M A Stadler; N Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

10.  Look who's talking: the deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Dave Saint-Amour; Thomas Gruber; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.