Literature DB >> 26231888

Radiation reduction and faster acquisition times with SPECT gated blood pool scans using a high-efficiency cardiac SPECT camera.

W Lane Duvall1, Krista A Guma-Demers2, Titus George2, Milena J Henzlova2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Planar gated blood pool scans are an established method for the evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) but the camera technology used for these studies has not significantly changed in decades. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of new high-efficiency SPECT gated blood pool scans compared to traditional scans and determine if they can be performed with lower radiation doses or faster acquisition times.
METHODS: Patients undergoing a planar gated blood pool scan on a Na-I SPECT camera who consented to participate were subsequently imaged for 5 minutes in "List Mode" using a high-efficiency SPECT camera. LVEF was calculated for both the planar study and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 minutes of acquisition on the high-efficiency camera. Counts acquired in the field of view, counts in the cardiac blood pool and LVEF were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were analyzed (48% male, mean age 55 years, and BMI 27.6 kg/m(2)) who received an average Tc-99m dose of 20.3 mCi (5.3 mSv), 17 (37%) with abnormal LVEF's. The Na-I camera averaged 24,514 counts/min/mCi in the field of view and 8662 counts/min/mCi in the cardiac blood pool while the high-efficiency camera averaged 65,219 counts/min/mCi and 41,427 counts/min/mCi, respectively. Compared to the planar calculation of LVEF, 1-minute SPECT LVEF was on average 8.6 ± 10.7 higher, 2 minutes 3.5 ± 7.6 higher, 3 minutes 2.9 ± 8.5 higher, 4 minutes 2.5 ± 7.0 higher, and 5 minutes 1.1 ± 6.2 higher. Good correlation was seen between the SPECT LVEF's and the planar LVEF's across all acquisition times with correlation coefficients of 0.74-0.93.
CONCLUSIONS: High-efficiency SPECT technology can reduce radiation exposure to patients during gated blood pool imaging or decrease acquisition time while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Based on the improved count sensitivity with high-efficiency SPECT, a 50% reduction in injected activity may be achievable while maintaining short imaging times of 5 minutes, with further reduction possible at longer imaging times.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gated blood pool scans; High-efficiency SPECT; Radiation exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26231888     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0214-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  21 in total

1.  Planar imaging versus gated blood-pool SPECT for the assessment of ventricular performance: a multicenter study.

Authors:  M W Groch; E G DePuey; A C Belzberg; W D Erwin; M Kamran; C A Barnett; R C Hendel; S M Spies; A Ali; R C Marshall
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography.

Authors:  James R Corbett; Olakunle O Akinboboye; Stephen L Bacharach; Jeffrey S Borer; Elias H Botvinick; E Gordon DePuey; Edward P Ficaro; Christopher L Hansen; Milena J Henzlova; Serge Van Kriekinge
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of results from planar and SPECT gated blood-pool studies.

Authors:  M L Bartlett; G Srinivasan; W C Barker; A N Kitsiou; V Dilsizian; S L Bacharach
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Interstudy repeatability of left and right ventricular volume estimations by serial-gated tomographic radionuclide angiographies using a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector gamma camera.

Authors:  Maria M Jensen; Christine Haase; Bo Zerahn
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  The motivation to reproject gated blood pool SPECT data as planar data.

Authors:  Kenneth J Nichols; Denny D Watson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Criteria for the accurate interpretation of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac volumes as assessed by rest and exercise gated radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  J J Mahmarian; L Moye; M S Verani; T Eaton; M Francis; C M Pratt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Cardiac dedicated ultrafast SPECT cameras: new designs and clinical implications.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Tracy L Faber; Fabio P Esteves
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Advances in nuclear cardiac instrumentation with a view towards reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; W Lane Duvall; Milena J Henzlova; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Cardiotoxicity after anthracycline chemotherapy in breast carcinoma: effects on left ventricular ejection fraction, troponin I and brain natriuretic peptide.

Authors:  Mauro Feola; Ornella Garrone; Marcella Occelli; Antonella Francini; Alberto Biggi; Gianluca Visconti; Fabrizia Albrile; Marco Bobbio; Marco Merlano
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 10.  Scintigraphic techniques for early detection of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Annelies M C Mavinkurve-Groothuis; Louise Bellersen; Martin Gotthardt; Wim J G Oyen; Livia Kapusta; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2013-08-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  The time for radionuclide ventriculography resurrection is coming.

Authors:  Raffaele Giubbini; Elisa Milan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Left ventricular ejection fraction determined with the simulation of a very low-dose CZT-SPECT protocol and an additional count-calibration on planar radionuclide angiographic data.

Authors:  Hubert Tissot; Véronique Roch; Olivier Morel; Nicolas Veran; Mathieu Perrin; Marine Claudin; Antoine Verger; Gilles Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie; Laetitia Imbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Which SPECT for today, which SPECT for tomorrow?

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Low-dose dobutamine stress gated blood pool SPECT assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve in ischemic cardiomyopathy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Vladimir V Shipulin; Sergey L Andreev; Andrew S Pryakhin; Andrew V Mochula; Alina N Maltseva; Svetlana I Sazonova; Vladimir M Shipulin; Samia Massalha; Konstantin V Zavadovsky
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Cardiac CZT-SPECT: More than left ventricular imaging.

Authors:  Bo Zerahn; Christian Haarmark
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  An Algorithm for Individual Dosage in Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride SPECT-Gated Radionuclide Angiography.

Authors:  Maria Normand Hansen; Christian Haarmark; Bent Kristensen; Bo Zerahn
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.