Literature DB >> 30557224

Masking Release for Speech in Modulated Maskers: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures.

A Michelle Tanner1, Emily R Spitzer1,2, J P Hyzy1, John H Grose1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to obtain an electrophysiological analog of masking release using speech-evoked cortical potentials in steady and modulated maskers and to relate this masking release to behavioral measures for the same stimuli. The hypothesis was that the evoked potentials can be tracked to a lower stimulus level in a modulated masker than in a steady masker and that the magnitude of this electrophysiological masking release is of the same order as that of the behavioral masking release for the same stimuli.
DESIGN: Cortical potentials evoked by an 80-ms /ba/ stimulus were measured in two steady maskers (30 and 65 dB SPL), and in a masker that modulated between these two levels at a rate of 25 Hz. In each masker, a level series was undertaken to determine electrophysiological threshold. Behavioral detection thresholds were determined in the same maskers using an adaptive tracking procedure. Masking release was defined as the difference between signal thresholds measured in the steady 65-dB SPL masker and the modulated masker. A total of 23 normal-hearing adults participated.
RESULTS: Electrophysiological thresholds were uniformly elevated relative to behavioral thresholds by about 6.5 dB. However, the magnitude of masking release was about 13.5 dB for both measurement domains.
CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological measures of masking release using speech-evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials correspond closely to behavioral estimates for the same stimuli. This suggests that objective measures based on electrophysiological techniques can be used to reliably gauge aspects of temporal processing ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30557224      PMCID: PMC6570590          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  36 in total

1.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features.

Authors:  Guy Lightfoot; Vicki Kennedy
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D Bower
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal analysis in children.

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall; C Gibbs
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04

6.  Forward and Backward Masking of Consonants in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Heather L Porter; Emily R Spitzer; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Maturation of CAEP in infants and children: a review.

Authors:  Julia Louise Wunderlich; Barbara Katherine Cone-Wesson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss.

Authors:  Betty Tsu; Lena L N Wong; Eddie C M Wong
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  1 in total

1.  Age-Related Differences in Early Cortical Representations of Target Speech Masked by Either Steady-State Noise or Competing Speech.

Authors:  Bruce A Schneider; Cristina Rabaglia; Meital Avivi-Reich; Dena Krieger; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.