Literature DB >> 35364963

Stimulus context affects the phonemic categorization of temporally based word contrasts in adult cochlear-implant users.

Zilong Xie1, Samira Anderson2, Matthew J Goupell2.   

Abstract

Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely heavily on temporal envelope cues for speech understanding. This study examined whether their sensitivity to temporal cues in word segments is affected when the words are preceded by non-informative carrier sentences. Thirteen adult CI users performed phonemic categorization tasks that present primarily temporally based word contrasts: Buy-Pie contrast with word-initial stop of varying voice-onset time (VOT), and Dish-Ditch contrast with varying silent intervals preceding the word-final fricative. These words were presented in isolation or were preceded by carrier stimuli including a sentence, a sentence-envelope-modulated noise, or an unmodulated speech-shaped noise. While participants were able to categorize both word contrasts, stimulus context effects were observed primarily for the Buy-Pie contrast, such that participants reported more "Buy" responses for words with longer VOTs in conditions with carrier stimuli than in isolation. The two non-speech carrier stimuli yielded similar or even greater context effects than sentences. The context effects disappeared when target words were delayed from the carrier stimuli for ≥75 ms. These results suggest that stimulus contexts affect auditory temporal processing in CI users but the context effects appear to be cue-specific. The context effects may be governed by general auditory processes, not those specific to speech processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35364963      PMCID: PMC8957389          DOI: 10.1121/10.0009838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

Review 1.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  P X Joris; C E Schreiner; A Rees
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  A psychophysical method for measuring spatial resolution in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Forward masking of amplitude modulation: basic characteristics.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Jessica Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Forward masking by sinusoidal and noise maskers.

Authors:  D L Weber; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception.

Authors:  M F Dorman; L J Raphael; A M Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masking Period Patterns and Forward Masking for Speech-Shaped Noise: Age-Related Effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Denise C Menezes; Heather L Porter; Silvana Griz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Age-Related Temporal Processing Deficits in Word Segments in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.