Literature DB >> 26222764

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III triple negative breast cancer on eligibility for breast-conserving surgery and breast conservation rates: surgical results from CALGB 40603 (Alliance).

Mehra Golshan1, Constance T Cirrincione, William M Sikov, Donald A Berry, Sara Jasinski, Tracey F Weisberg, George Somlo, Clifford Hudis, Eric Winer, David W Ollila.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) at increasing the rate of successful breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in triple negative breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Inducing tumor regression to permit BCT is often cited to support administration of NST. To quantify this benefit, we conducted a surgical companion study to CALGB40603, a randomized phase II, 2×2 factorial trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel ± carboplatin ± bevacizumab (B) followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide ± B in stage II-III triple negative breast cancer.
METHODS: Before and after NST, treating surgeons evaluated BCT candidacy by clinico-radiographic criteria; surgery performed was at surgeon and patient discretion. We measured (1) conversion rates from BCT-ineligible to BCT-eligible, (2) surgical choices in BCT candidates, and (3) rates of successful BCT with tumor-free margins.
RESULTS: Four hundred four patients were assessable for surgical outcomes. Two hundred nineteen (54%) were BCT candidates before NST. One hundred ninety-seven (90%) remained BCT candidates after NST, of whom 138 (70%) chose BCT, which was successful in 130 (94%). Of 185 (46%) who were not BCT candidates before NST, 78 (42%) converted to candidates with NST. Of these, 53 (68%) chose BCT with a 91% (48/53) success rate. The overall BCT-eligibility rate rose from 54% to 68% (275/404) with NST. Addition of carboplatin, B, or both increased conversion rates.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to document prospectively a 42% conversion rate from BCT-ineligible to BCT-eligible, resulting in a 14% absolute increase in BCT eligibility. BCT was successful in 93% of patients who opted for it, but 31% of BCT-eligible patients still chose mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26222764      PMCID: PMC4710511          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  Influences on decision for mastectomy in patients eligible for breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  E E Rippy; R Ainsworth; D Sathananthan; J Kollias; M Bochner; R Whitfield
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017.

Authors:  Jennifer F De Los Santos; Alan Cantor; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Mehra Golshan; Janet K Horton; Clifford A Hudis; Nola M Hylton; Kandace McGuire; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ingrid M Meszoely; Rita Nanda; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Surgical management of breast cancer in BRCA-mutation carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonis Valachis; Andreas D Nearchou; Pehr Lind
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Factors affecting surgical management following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the NeoALTTO phase III trial.

Authors:  C Criscitiello; H A Azim; E de Azambuja; I T Rubio
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6.

Authors:  S M Scholl; A Fourquet; B Asselain; J Y Pierga; J R Vilcoq; J C Durand; T Dorval; T Palangié; M Jouve; P Beuzeboc
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sibylle Loibl; Christoph Salat; Carsten Denkert; Mahdi Rezai; Jens U Blohmer; Christian Jackisch; Stefan Paepke; Bernd Gerber; Dirk M Zahm; Sherko Kümmel; Holger Eidtmann; Peter Klare; Jens Huober; Serban Costa; Hans Tesch; Claus Hanusch; Jörn Hilfrich; Fariba Khandan; Peter A Fasching; Bruno V Sinn; Knut Engels; Keyur Mehta; Valentina Nekljudova; Michael Untch
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Which eligible breast conservation patients choose mastectomy in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer?

Authors:  Cameron D Adkisson; Sanjay P Bagaria; Alexander S Parker; Jillian M Bray; Tammeza Gibson; Colleen S Thomas; Michael G Heckman; Sarah A McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Increasing mastectomy rates-the effect of environmental factors on the choice for mastectomy: a comparative analysis between Canada and the United States.

Authors:  Andrea M Covelli; Nancy N Baxter; Margaret I Fitch; Frances C Wright
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Surgical patterns of care in patients with invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast magnetic resonance imaging: results of a secondary analysis of TBCRC 017.

Authors:  Kandace P McGuire; E Shelley Hwang; Alan Cantor; Mehra Golshan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Janet K Horton; Rita Nanda; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Cliff A Hudis; Ingrid Meszoely; Jennifer F De Los Santos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mediget Teshome; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.495

View more
  59 in total

1.  Axillary Management of Stage II/III Breast Cancer in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: Results of CALGB 40601 (HER2-Positive) and CALGB 40603 (Triple-Negative).

Authors:  David W Ollila; Constance T Cirrincione; Donald A Berry; Lisa A Carey; William M Sikov; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Update on the Treatment of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-04-14

Review 3.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 4.  Biology and Management of Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-11

5.  Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect morbidity, mortality, reoperations, or readmissions in patients undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy for breast cancer?

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Barbara Bennie; Mallory S Bray; Choua A Vang; Jared H Linebarger
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 6.  Impalpable breast lesion localisation, a logistical challenge: results of the UK iBRA-NET national practice questionnaire.

Authors:  Santosh K Somasundaram; Shelley Potter; Suzanne Elgammal; Anthony J Maxwell; Amtul S Sami; Sue K Down; Rajiv V Dave; James Harvey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Early stage triple negative breast cancer: Management and future directions.

Authors:  Lubna N Chaudhary
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on eligibility for and frequency of breast conservation in stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer: surgical results of CALGB 40601 (Alliance).

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Constance T Cirrincione; William M Sikov; Lisa A Carey; Donald A Berry; Beth Overmoyer; Nora L Henry; George Somlo; Elisa Port; Harold J Burstein; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; David W Ollila
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Impact of sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response rate in HER2-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M E Tesch; S K Chia; C E Simmons; N LeVasseur
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Impact of race, ethnicity, and BMI on achievement of pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a pooled analysis of four prospective Alliance clinical trials (A151426).

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Karla V Ballman; Carrie Strand; Judy C Boughey; Aman U Buzdar; Lisa A Carey; William M Sikov; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.