Literature DB >> 24794243

Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial.

Gunter von Minckwitz1, Andreas Schneeweiss2, Sibylle Loibl3, Christoph Salat4, Carsten Denkert5, Mahdi Rezai6, Jens U Blohmer7, Christian Jackisch8, Stefan Paepke9, Bernd Gerber10, Dirk M Zahm11, Sherko Kümmel12, Holger Eidtmann13, Peter Klare14, Jens Huober15, Serban Costa16, Hans Tesch17, Claus Hanusch18, Jörn Hilfrich19, Fariba Khandan20, Peter A Fasching21, Bruno V Sinn5, Knut Engels22, Keyur Mehta23, Valentina Nekljudova23, Michael Untch24.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggest that triple-negative breast cancers are sensitive to interstrand crosslinking agents, and that synergy may exist for the combination of a taxane, trastuzumab, and a platinum salt for HER2-positive breast cancer. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy of the addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer.
METHODS: Patients with previously untreated, non-metastatic, stage II-III, triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated for 18 weeks with paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) once a week) and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m(2) once a week). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer received simultaneous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks). Patients with HER2-positive disease received simultaneous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg initial dose with subsequent doses of 6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) and lapatinib (750 mg daily). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio with dynamic allocation and minimisation, stratified by biological subtype and Ki-67 level to receive, at the same time as the backbone regimens, either carboplatin (AUC 1·5 [2·0 for the first 329 patients] once a week) or no carboplatin. The primary endpoint the proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response (defined as ypT0 ypN0), analysed for all patients who started treatment; a p value of less than 0·2 was deemed significant for the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01426880.
FINDINGS: 296 patients were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin and 299 to no additional carboplatin, of whom 295 and 293 started treatment, respectively. In this final analysis, 129 patients (43·7%, 95% CI 38·1-49·4) in the carboplatin group achieved a pathological complete response, compared with 108 patients (36·9%, 31·3-42·4) without carboplatin (odds ratio 1·33, 95% CI 0·96-1·85; p=0·107). Of the patients with triple-negative breast cancer, 84 (53·2%, 54·4-60·9) of 158 patients achieved a pathological complete response with carboplatin, compared with 58 (36·9%, 29·4-44·5) of 157 without (p=0·005). Of the patients with HER2-positive tumours, 45 (32·8%, 25·0-40·7) of 137 patients achieved a pathological complete response with carboplatin compared with 50 (36·8%, 28·7-44·9) of 136 without (p=0·581; test for interaction p=0·015). Haematological and non-haematological toxic effects that were significantly more common in the carboplatin group than in the no-carboplatin group included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (192 [65%] vs 79 [27%]), grade 3 or 4 anaemia (45 [15%] vs one [<1%]), grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (42 [14%] vs one [<1%]), and grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea (51 [17%] vs 32 [11%]); carboplatin was more often associated with dose discontinuations (141 [48%] with carboplatin and 114 [39%] without carboplatin; p=0·031). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 haematological events decreased from 82% (n=135) to 70% (n=92) and grade 3 or 4 non-haematological events from 78% (n=128) to 59% (n=77) in the carboplatin arm when the dose of carboplatin was reduced from AUC 2·0 to 1·5.
INTERPRETATION: The addition of neoadjuvant carboplatin to a regimen of a taxane, an anthracycline, and targeted therapy significantly increases the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. This regimen seems to increase responses in patients with triple-negative breast cancer, but not in those with HER2-positive breast cancer. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, and Teva.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794243     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70160-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  283 in total

Review 1.  Landscape of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tufia C Haddad; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Assessing the role of platinum agents in aggressive breast cancers.

Authors:  William M Sikov
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Germline Mutations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eric Hahnen; Jan Hauke; Christoph Engel; Guido Neidhardt; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita K Schmutzler
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Biological Subtypes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Hubalek; Theresa Czech; Hannes Müller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Molecular Classification and Future Therapeutic Challenges of Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nikolaos Garmpis; Christos Damaskos; Anna Garmpi; Konstantinos Nikolettos; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Evangelos Diamantis; Paraskevi Farmaki; Alexandros Patsouras; Errika Voutyritsa; Athanasios Syllaios; Constantinos G Zografos; Efstathios A Antoniou; Nikos Nikolettos; Alkiviadis Kostakis; Konstantinos Kontzoglou; Dimitrios Schizas; Afroditi Nonni
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.

Authors:  A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Update on the Treatment of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-04-14

9.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melinda L Telli; Kirsten M Timms; Julia Reid; Bryan Hennessy; Gordon B Mills; Kristin C Jensen; Zoltan Szallasi; William T Barry; Eric P Winer; Nadine M Tung; Steven J Isakoff; Paula D Ryan; April Greene-Colozzi; Alexander Gutin; Zaina Sangale; Diana Iliev; Chris Neff; Victor Abkevich; Joshua T Jones; Jerry S Lanchbury; Anne-Renee Hartman; Judy E Garber; James M Ford; Daniel P Silver; Andrea L Richardson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance).

Authors:  William M Sikov; Donald A Berry; Charles M Perou; Baljit Singh; Constance T Cirrincione; Sara M Tolaney; Charles S Kuzma; Timothy J Pluard; George Somlo; Elisa R Port; Mehra Golshan; Jennifer R Bellon; Deborah Collyar; Olwen M Hahn; Lisa A Carey; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.