Literature DB >> 25081340

Increasing mastectomy rates-the effect of environmental factors on the choice for mastectomy: a comparative analysis between Canada and the United States.

Andrea M Covelli1, Nancy N Baxter, Margaret I Fitch, Frances C Wright.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Unilateral mastectomy (UM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) have been increasing. Numerous etiological factors for this rise have been suggested, including increasing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and reconstruction, surgeon's preference, and patient's choice. We conducted a qualitative study to explore what role the surgeon and their practice environment play in the increasing rates.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with general surgeons to explore their current approach to treating ESBC and their experience with women requesting mastectomy. Purposive sampling identified surgeons across Ontario, Canada, and the United States (US). Constant comparative analysis identified key concepts.
RESULTS: Data saturation was achieved after 45 interviews. 'The effect of external factors on rising mastectomy rates' was the dominant theme. All surgeons described increasing mastectomy rates over the last 5 years, and all surgeons discussed breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and UM as equivalent options. However, US surgeons discussed reconstruction early in the consultation process, reflecting legislative requirements. In contrast, Ontario surgeons discussed reconstruction only when a patient was considering mastectomy. Ontario surgeons often recommended BCT, whereas US surgeons rarely made a direct recommendation regarding the extent of surgery. Neither US nor Canadian surgeons recommended the use of UM + CPM in average-risk ESBC, and all surgeons described women initiating this request. MRI use and access to immediate breast reconstruction also impacted the choice for mastectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of MRI, access to reconstruction, and legislative requirements regarding information disclosure, appeared to influence the surgical consultation process and the patient's request for CPM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25081340     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3955-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Factors influencing surgical treatment decisions for breast cancer: a qualitative exploration of surgeon and patient perspectives.

Authors:  E Dicks; R Roome; J Chafe; E Powell; F McCrate; C Simmonds; H Etchegary
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Mario Marx; Michael Untch; Andree Faridi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implications for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Jeremie D Oliver; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

4.  Understanding Stakeholder Preference for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Conjoint Analysis.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Hina Panchal; Melissa Pilewskie; Clara Lee; Shantanu N Razdan; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.532

5.  Trends in surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer reveal decreasing mastectomy use between 2003 and 2016 by age, race, and rurality.

Authors:  Mya L Roberson; Hazel B Nichols; Andrew F Olshan; Stephanie B Wheeler; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.624

6.  Exploring reasons for overuse of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in Canada.

Authors:  J E Squires; S N Simard; S Asad; D Stacey; I D Graham; M Coughlin; M Clemons; J M Grimshaw; J Zhang; J M Caudrelier; A Arnaout
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III triple negative breast cancer on eligibility for breast-conserving surgery and breast conservation rates: surgical results from CALGB 40603 (Alliance).

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Constance T Cirrincione; William M Sikov; Donald A Berry; Sara Jasinski; Tracey F Weisberg; George Somlo; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; David W Ollila
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate stable at major Canadian breast cancer center.

Authors:  Amanda Roberts; Lakhbir Sandhu; Tulin D Cil; Stefan O P Hofer; Toni Zhong
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-10

9.  Accuracy of Predictions of Patients With Breast Cancer of Future Well-being After Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Michael Patrick Pignone; Allison M Deal; Lillian Blizard; Caprice Hunt; Ruth Huh; Yuen-Jong Liu; Peter Anthony Ubel
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Surgical Decision-Making Surrounding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Comparison of Treatment Goals, Preferences, and Psychosocial Outcomes from a Multicenter Survey of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ingrid M Lizarraga; Mary C Schroeder; Ismail Jatoi; Sonia L Sugg; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Laurel Hoeth; Elizabeth A Chrischilles
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.