Literature DB >> 27704226

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on eligibility for and frequency of breast conservation in stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer: surgical results of CALGB 40601 (Alliance).

Mehra Golshan1, Constance T Cirrincione2, William M Sikov3, Lisa A Carey4, Donald A Berry5, Beth Overmoyer6, Nora L Henry7, George Somlo8, Elisa Port9, Harold J Burstein6, Clifford Hudis10, Eric Winer6, David W Ollila11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It had been previously shown that patients who receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are more likely to undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) than those who have primary surgery. However, the frequency with which patients who are not BCT-eligible prior to NST convert to BCT-eligible with treatment is unknown. To document this conversion rate in a subset of patients expected to have a high clinical response rate to NST, we studied surgical assessment and management of patients enrolled on a randomized neoadjuvant trial for stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC)(CALGB 40601).
METHODS: The treating surgeon assessed BCT candidacy based on clinico-radiographic criteria both before and after NST. Definitive breast surgical management was at surgeon and patient discretion. We sought to determine (1) the conversion rate from BCT-ineligible to BCT-eligible (2) the percentage of BCT-eligible patients who chose breast conservation, and (3) the rate of successful BCT. We also evaluated surgeon-determined factors for BCT-ineligibility and the correlation between BCT eligibility and pathologic complete response (pCR).
RESULTS: Of 292 patients with pre- and post-NST surgical assessments, 59 % were non-BCT candidates at baseline. Of the 43 % of these patients who converted with NST, 67 % opted for BCT, with an 80 % success rate. NST increased the BCT-eligible rate from 41 to 64 %. Common factors cited for BCT-ineligibility prior to NST including tumor size (56 %) and probable poor cosmetic outcome (26 %) were reduced by 67 and 75 %, respectively, with treatment, while multicentricity, the second most common factor (33 %), fell by only 16 %. Since 23 % of the BCT-eligible patients chose mastectomy, BCT was the final surgical procedure in just 40 % of the patients. Patients considered BCT-eligible both at baseline and after NST had a pCR rate of 55 %, while patients who were BCT-ineligible prior to NST had the same pCR rate (44 %) whether they converted to BCT-eligible or not.
CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with HER2 + BC deemed ineligible for BCT at baseline can be converted to BCT-eligible with NST; excluding patients with multicentric disease substantially increases that percentage. In converted patients who opt for BCT, the success rate is similar to that of patients considered BCT-eligible at baseline. Whether a BCT-ineligible patient converts to BCT eligibility or not does not appear to affect the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Despite the efficacy of NST in this patient cohort, only 40 % of patients had successful BCT; further research into why BCT-eligible patients often opt for mastectomy is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast conserving therapy; HER2-positive breast cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27704226      PMCID: PMC5189982          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4006-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer. Time to reconsider the standard attitude.

Authors:  Marc Debled; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Christelle Breton-Callu; Stéphane Ferron; Gabrielle Hurtevent; Marion Fournier; Lionel Bourdarias; Hervé Bonnefoi; Louis Mauriac; Christine Tunon de Lara
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Primary Systemic Treatment in the Management of Operable Breast Cancer: Best Surgical Approach for Diagnosis, Biological Evaluation, and Research.

Authors:  Peter A Barry; Gaia Schiavon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2015-05

4.  Factors affecting surgical management following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the NeoALTTO phase III trial.

Authors:  C Criscitiello; H A Azim; E de Azambuja; I T Rubio
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sibylle Loibl; Christoph Salat; Carsten Denkert; Mahdi Rezai; Jens U Blohmer; Christian Jackisch; Stefan Paepke; Bernd Gerber; Dirk M Zahm; Sherko Kümmel; Holger Eidtmann; Peter Klare; Jens Huober; Serban Costa; Hans Tesch; Claus Hanusch; Jörn Hilfrich; Fariba Khandan; Peter A Fasching; Bruno V Sinn; Knut Engels; Keyur Mehta; Valentina Nekljudova; Michael Untch
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902.

Authors:  J A van der Hage; C J van de Velde; J P Julien; M Tubiana-Hulin; C Vandervelden; L Duchateau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Performance and Practice Guideline for the Use of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in the Management of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Dennis Holmes; A Colfry; Brian Czerniecki; Diana Dickson-Witmer; C Francisco Espinel; Elizabeth Feldman; Kristalyn Gallagher; Rachel Greenup; Virginia Herrmann; Henry Kuerer; Manmeet Malik; Eric Manahan; Jennifer O'Neill; Mita Patel; Molly Sebastian; Amanda Wheeler; Rena Kass
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Surgical patterns of care in patients with invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast magnetic resonance imaging: results of a secondary analysis of TBCRC 017.

Authors:  Kandace P McGuire; E Shelley Hwang; Alan Cantor; Mehra Golshan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Janet K Horton; Rita Nanda; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Cliff A Hudis; Ingrid Meszoely; Jennifer F De Los Santos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Molecular Heterogeneity and Response to Neoadjuvant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Targeting in CALGB 40601, a Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Trastuzumab With or Without Lapatinib.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Donald A Berry; Constance T Cirrincione; William T Barry; Brandelyn N Pitcher; Lyndsay N Harris; David W Ollila; Ian E Krop; Norah Lynn Henry; Douglas J Weckstein; Carey K Anders; Baljit Singh; Katherine A Hoadley; Michael Iglesia; Maggie Chon U Cheang; Charles M Perou; Eric P Winer; Clifford A Hudis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Local-regional control according to surrogate markers of breast cancer subtypes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Tse-Kuan Yu; Susan L Tucker; Isabelle Bedrosian; Jennifer K Litton; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Karen Hoffman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  18 in total

1.  Axillary Management of Stage II/III Breast Cancer in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: Results of CALGB 40601 (HER2-Positive) and CALGB 40603 (Triple-Negative).

Authors:  David W Ollila; Constance T Cirrincione; Donald A Berry; Lisa A Carey; William M Sikov; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Impalpable breast lesion localisation, a logistical challenge: results of the UK iBRA-NET national practice questionnaire.

Authors:  Santosh K Somasundaram; Shelley Potter; Suzanne Elgammal; Anthony J Maxwell; Amtul S Sami; Sue K Down; Rajiv V Dave; James Harvey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Locoregional Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Atif J Khan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  ASO Author Reflections: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer May Not Alter Increasing Trends for CPM Utilization.

Authors:  Nicole Christian; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Use After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicole Christian; Emily C Zabor; Michael Cassidy; Jessica Flynn; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Impact of sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response rate in HER2-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M E Tesch; S K Chia; C E Simmons; N LeVasseur
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Primary medical therapy and breast conservation treatment: the medical oncology perspective.

Authors:  Nan Soon Wong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

8.  Margin Assessment and Re-excision Rates for Patients Who Have Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Cindy Cen; Jennifer Chun; Elianna Kaplowitz; Deborah Axelrod; Richard Shapiro; Amber Guth; Freya Schnabel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Mark R Somerfield; Lisa A Carey; Jennie R Crews; Neelima Denduluri; E Shelley Hwang; Seema A Khan; Sibylle Loibl; Elizabeth A Morris; Alejandra Perez; Meredith M Regan; Patricia A Spears; Preeti K Sudheendra; W Fraser Symmans; Rachel L Yung; Brittany E Harvey; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  How Often Does Modern Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Downstage Patients to Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Authors:  Oriana Petruolo; Varadan Sevilimedu; Giacomo Montagna; Tiana Le; Monica Morrow; Andrea V Barrio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.