Mehra Golshan1, Constance T Cirrincione2, William M Sikov3, Lisa A Carey4, Donald A Berry5, Beth Overmoyer6, Nora L Henry7, George Somlo8, Elisa Port9, Harold J Burstein6, Clifford Hudis10, Eric Winer6, David W Ollila11. 1. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. mgolshan@partners.org. 2. Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 5. Alliance Statistics and Data Center, M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 8. Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 9. Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 10. Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 11. Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It had been previously shown that patients who receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are more likely to undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) than those who have primary surgery. However, the frequency with which patients who are not BCT-eligible prior to NST convert to BCT-eligible with treatment is unknown. To document this conversion rate in a subset of patients expected to have a high clinical response rate to NST, we studied surgical assessment and management of patients enrolled on a randomized neoadjuvant trial for stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC)(CALGB 40601). METHODS: The treating surgeon assessed BCT candidacy based on clinico-radiographic criteria both before and after NST. Definitive breast surgical management was at surgeon and patient discretion. We sought to determine (1) the conversion rate from BCT-ineligible to BCT-eligible (2) the percentage of BCT-eligible patients who chose breast conservation, and (3) the rate of successful BCT. We also evaluated surgeon-determined factors for BCT-ineligibility and the correlation between BCT eligibility and pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS: Of 292 patients with pre- and post-NST surgical assessments, 59 % were non-BCT candidates at baseline. Of the 43 % of these patients who converted with NST, 67 % opted for BCT, with an 80 % success rate. NST increased the BCT-eligible rate from 41 to 64 %. Common factors cited for BCT-ineligibility prior to NST including tumor size (56 %) and probable poor cosmetic outcome (26 %) were reduced by 67 and 75 %, respectively, with treatment, while multicentricity, the second most common factor (33 %), fell by only 16 %. Since 23 % of the BCT-eligible patients chose mastectomy, BCT was the final surgical procedure in just 40 % of the patients. Patients considered BCT-eligible both at baseline and after NST had a pCR rate of 55 %, while patients who were BCT-ineligible prior to NST had the same pCR rate (44 %) whether they converted to BCT-eligible or not. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with HER2 + BC deemed ineligible for BCT at baseline can be converted to BCT-eligible with NST; excluding patients with multicentric disease substantially increases that percentage. In converted patients who opt for BCT, the success rate is similar to that of patients considered BCT-eligible at baseline. Whether a BCT-ineligible patient converts to BCT eligibility or not does not appear to affect the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Despite the efficacy of NST in this patient cohort, only 40 % of patients had successful BCT; further research into why BCT-eligible patients often opt for mastectomy is needed.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: It had been previously shown that patients who receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are more likely to undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) than those who have primary surgery. However, the frequency with which patients who are not BCT-eligible prior to NST convert to BCT-eligible with treatment is unknown. To document this conversion rate in a subset of patients expected to have a high clinical response rate to NST, we studied surgical assessment and management of patients enrolled on a randomized neoadjuvant trial for stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC)(CALGB 40601). METHODS: The treating surgeon assessed BCT candidacy based on clinico-radiographic criteria both before and after NST. Definitive breast surgical management was at surgeon and patient discretion. We sought to determine (1) the conversion rate from BCT-ineligible to BCT-eligible (2) the percentage of BCT-eligible patients who chose breast conservation, and (3) the rate of successful BCT. We also evaluated surgeon-determined factors for BCT-ineligibility and the correlation between BCT eligibility and pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS: Of 292 patients with pre- and post-NST surgical assessments, 59 % were non-BCT candidates at baseline. Of the 43 % of these patients who converted with NST, 67 % opted for BCT, with an 80 % success rate. NST increased the BCT-eligible rate from 41 to 64 %. Common factors cited for BCT-ineligibility prior to NST including tumor size (56 %) and probable poor cosmetic outcome (26 %) were reduced by 67 and 75 %, respectively, with treatment, while multicentricity, the second most common factor (33 %), fell by only 16 %. Since 23 % of the BCT-eligible patients chose mastectomy, BCT was the final surgical procedure in just 40 % of the patients. Patients considered BCT-eligible both at baseline and after NST had a pCR rate of 55 %, while patients who were BCT-ineligible prior to NST had the same pCR rate (44 %) whether they converted to BCT-eligible or not. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with HER2 + BC deemed ineligible for BCT at baseline can be converted to BCT-eligible with NST; excluding patients with multicentric disease substantially increases that percentage. In converted patients who opt for BCT, the success rate is similar to that of patients considered BCT-eligible at baseline. Whether a BCT-ineligible patient converts to BCT eligibility or not does not appear to affect the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Despite the efficacy of NST in this patient cohort, only 40 % of patients had successful BCT; further research into why BCT-eligible patients often opt for mastectomy is needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast conserving therapy; HER2-positive breast cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy
Authors: Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sibylle Loibl; Christoph Salat; Carsten Denkert; Mahdi Rezai; Jens U Blohmer; Christian Jackisch; Stefan Paepke; Bernd Gerber; Dirk M Zahm; Sherko Kümmel; Holger Eidtmann; Peter Klare; Jens Huober; Serban Costa; Hans Tesch; Claus Hanusch; Jörn Hilfrich; Fariba Khandan; Peter A Fasching; Bruno V Sinn; Knut Engels; Keyur Mehta; Valentina Nekljudova; Michael Untch Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: J A van der Hage; C J van de Velde; J P Julien; M Tubiana-Hulin; C Vandervelden; L Duchateau Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dennis Holmes; A Colfry; Brian Czerniecki; Diana Dickson-Witmer; C Francisco Espinel; Elizabeth Feldman; Kristalyn Gallagher; Rachel Greenup; Virginia Herrmann; Henry Kuerer; Manmeet Malik; Eric Manahan; Jennifer O'Neill; Mita Patel; Molly Sebastian; Amanda Wheeler; Rena Kass Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kandace P McGuire; E Shelley Hwang; Alan Cantor; Mehra Golshan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Janet K Horton; Rita Nanda; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Cliff A Hudis; Ingrid Meszoely; Jennifer F De Los Santos Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lisa A Carey; Donald A Berry; Constance T Cirrincione; William T Barry; Brandelyn N Pitcher; Lyndsay N Harris; David W Ollila; Ian E Krop; Norah Lynn Henry; Douglas J Weckstein; Carey K Anders; Baljit Singh; Katherine A Hoadley; Michael Iglesia; Maggie Chon U Cheang; Charles M Perou; Eric P Winer; Clifford A Hudis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Abigail S Caudle; Tse-Kuan Yu; Susan L Tucker; Isabelle Bedrosian; Jennifer K Litton; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Karen Hoffman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: David W Ollila; Constance T Cirrincione; Donald A Berry; Lisa A Carey; William M Sikov; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer; Mehra Golshan Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Santosh K Somasundaram; Shelley Potter; Suzanne Elgammal; Anthony J Maxwell; Amtul S Sami; Sue K Down; Rajiv V Dave; James Harvey Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Nicole Christian; Emily C Zabor; Michael Cassidy; Jessica Flynn; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Larissa A Korde; Mark R Somerfield; Lisa A Carey; Jennie R Crews; Neelima Denduluri; E Shelley Hwang; Seema A Khan; Sibylle Loibl; Elizabeth A Morris; Alejandra Perez; Meredith M Regan; Patricia A Spears; Preeti K Sudheendra; W Fraser Symmans; Rachel L Yung; Brittany E Harvey; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 44.544