| Literature DB >> 26218925 |
Norihisa Yamamoto1, Shigeto Hamaguchi1, Yukihiro Akeda1, Pitak Santanirand2, Anusak Kerdsin3, Masafumi Seki4, Yoshikazu Ishii5, Wantana Paveenkittiporn3, Robert A Bonomo6, Kazunori Oishi7, Kumthorn Malathum2, Kazunori Tomono4.
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment is increasingly complicated by the escalating incidence of antimicrobial resistance. Among drug-resistant pathogens, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb) is of increasing concern because of the limited applicable therapies and its expanding global distribution in developed countries and newly industrialized countries. Therefore, a rapid detection method that can be used even in resource-poor countries is urgently required to control this global public health threat. Conventional techniques, such as bacterial culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are insufficient to combat this threat because they are time-consuming and laborious. In this study, we developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for detecting blaOXA-23-positive CRAb, the most prevalent form of CRAb in Asia, especially in Thailand, and confirmed its efficacy as a surveillance tool in a clinical setting. Clinical samples of sputum and rectal swabs were collected from patients in a hospital in Bangkok and used for LAMP assays. After boiling and centrifugation, the supernatants were used directly in the assay. In parallel, a culture method was used for comparison purposes to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of LAMP. As a first step, a total of 120 sputum samples were collected. The sensitivity of LAMP was 88.6% (39/44), and its specificity was 92.1% (70/76) using the culture method as the "gold standard". When surveillance samples including sputum and rectal swabs were analyzed with the LAMP assay, its sensitivity was 100.0%. This method enables the direct analysis of clinical specimens and provides results within 40 minutes of sample collection, making it a useful tool for surveillance even in resource-poor countries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26218925 PMCID: PMC4517775 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Genotypes of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) isolates from hospital patients in Bangkok.
| Type number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| 2 | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | 2 |
| 3 | + | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| 4 | + | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | 1 |
| 5 | + | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | 2 |
| 6 | + | - | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| 7 | + | - | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | 1 |
| 8 | + | - | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | + | 2 |
| 9 | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | 2 |
| 10 | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
| 11 | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | 14 |
| 12 | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | 4 |
| 13 | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | 2 |
| 14 | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | 34 |
| 15 | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | 83 |
| 16 | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | + | 16 |
| 17 | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | 1 |
| Total | 170 | 163 | 0 | 173 | 3 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 140 | 28 | 173 |
| % | 98.2 | 94.2 | 0 | 100 | 1.7 | 79.8 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 | 80.9 | 16.2 | 100 |
Totala: Total number of isolates with each resistance gene
%b: The proportion of isolates with each resistance gene
LAMP primers used for bla oxa-23 and the ITS sequence.
| Target gene | Nucleotide sequence (5′-3′) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| OXA23 F3 | GAAGCCATGAAGCTTTCTG | This study |
| OXA23 B3 | GTATGTGCTAATTGGGAAACA | ||
| OXA23 FIP | ACCGAAACCAATACGTTTTACTTCTCAGTCCCAGTCTATCAGGA | ||
| OXA23 BIP | CTGAAATTGGACAGCAGGTTGACTCTACCTCTTGAATAGGCG | ||
| OXA23 LF | TTTTGCATGAGATCAAGACCGA | ||
| OXA23 LB | CTGGTTGGTAGGACCATTAAAGGTT | ||
| 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer | ITS-F3 | CGGTAATTAGTGTGATCTGAC | [ |
| ITS-B3 | CATTTCAGTTTAGAGCACTGT | ||
| ITS-FIP | TTGCTTAACCTAAACTCTTGAGTGAGAAGACACATTAACTCATTAACAGA | ||
| ITS-BIP | AGCAAATTAACTGAATCAAGCGTTTACTTAAGCACCGTACAGC | ||
| ITS-LF | AATTTATTTCAGACTCAATTTTGCCAA | ||
| ITS-LB | TGGTATGTGAATTTAGATTGAA |
F3: outer forward primer; B3: backward inner primer; LF/LB: loop primersouter backward primer; FIP: forward inner primer; BIP:
Fig 1Real-time turbidity assays under various conditions using a turbidimeter.
(A) To determine the optimal reaction conditions, a LAMP assay was performed on extracted bacterial DNA at temperatures ranging from 62°C to 67°C. At 65°C, the reaction finished within the shortest period of time, and the negative control remained transparent after 60 minutes of incubation. (B) To determine the detection limit, the extracted DNA templates were serially diluted 10 times (from 2 pg to 2×10−6 pg) and used in the LAMP assay. The turbidity was evaluated with a turbidimeter every 5 minutes.
Sensitivity and specificity of the CRAb-LAMP assay.
| Culture | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPVa | NPVb | PLRc | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||||||
| Clinical Samples | Sputum Directly | Positive | 39 | 6 | 88.6 | 92.1 | 86.7 | 94.5 | 11.2 |
| Negative | 5 | 70 | (75.4–96.2) | (83.6–97.0) | (73.2–95.0) | (85.1–97.8) | |||
| Extracted DNA | Positive | 39 | 7 | 88.6 | 90.8 | 84.8 | 93.2 | 9.63 | |
| Negative | 5 | 69 | (75.4–96.2) | (81.4–96.2) | (71.1–93.7) | (84.9–97.8) | |||
PPVa: positive predictive value;NPVb: negative predictive value; PLRc: positive likelihood ratio
Sensitivity and specificity of the Surveillance LAMP compared with culture.
| Culture | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPVa | NPVb | PLRc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | |||||||
| LAMP | Positive | 30 | 13 | 100 | 83.3 | 69.7 | 100 | 6.00 |
| Negative | 0 | 65 | (88.4–100) | (73.2–90.8) | (53.9–82.8) | (94.5–100) | ||
PPVa: positive predictive value; NPVb: negative predictive value; PLRc: positive likelihood ratio