Literature DB >> 26213413

Combining MRI with PET for partial volume correction improves image-derived input functions in mice.

Eleanor Evans1, Guido Buonincontri2, David Izquierdo3, Carmen Methner4, Rob C Hawkes5, Richard E Ansorge6, Thomas Krieg7, T Adrian Carpenter8, Stephen J Sawiak9.   

Abstract

Accurate kinetic modelling using dynamic PET requires knowledge of the tracer concentration in plasma, known as the arterial input function (AIF). AIFs are usually determined by invasive blood sampling, but this is prohibitive in murine studies due to low total blood volumes. As a result of the low spatial resolution of PET, image-derived input functions (IDIFs) must be extracted from left ventricular blood pool (LVBP) ROIs of the mouse heart. This is challenging because of partial volume and spillover effects between the LVBP and myocardium, contaminating IDIFs with tissue signal. We have applied the geometric transfer matrix (GTM) method of partial volume correction (PVC) to 12 mice injected with 18F-FDG affected by a Myocardial Infarction (MI), of which 6 were treated with a drug which reduced infarction size [1]. We utilised high resolution MRI to assist in segmenting mouse hearts into 5 classes: LVBP, infarcted myocardium, healthy myocardium, lungs/body and background. The signal contribution from these 5 classes was convolved with the point spread function (PSF) of the Cambridge split magnet PET scanner and a non-linear fit was performed on the 5 measured signal components. The corrected IDIF was taken as the fitted LVBP component. It was found that the GTM PVC method could recover an IDIF with less contamination from spillover than an IDIF extracted from PET data alone. More realistic values of Ki were achieved using GTM IDIFs, which were shown to be significantly different (p<0.05) between the treated and untreated groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial input function; Geometric transfer matrix; MRI; partial volume correction; small animal PET

Year:  2015        PMID: 26213413      PMCID: PMC4510926          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2015.2433897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  25 in total

Review 1.  Image-derived input function for brain PET studies: many challenges and few opportunities.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Kewei Chen; Jeih-San Liow; Masahiro Fujita; Robert B Innis
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation.

Authors:  O G Rousset; Y Ma; A C Evans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data.

Authors:  C S Patlak; R G Blasberg; J D Fenstermacher
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; James W Fletcher
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  NEMA NU 4-2008 comparison of preclinical PET imaging systems.

Authors:  Andrew L Goertzen; Qinan Bao; Mélanie Bergeron; Eric Blankemeyer; Stephan Blinder; Mario Cañadas; Arion F Chatziioannou; Katherine Dinelle; Esmat Elhami; Hans-Sonke Jans; Eduardo Lage; Roger Lecomte; Vesna Sossi; Suleman Surti; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Juan José Vaquero; Esther Vicente; Darin A Williams; Richard Laforest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Quantitative PET imaging detects early metabolic remodeling in a mouse model of pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy in vivo.

Authors:  Min Zhong; Clayton E Alonso; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Bijoy K Kundu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Comparison of methods for magnetic resonance-guided [18-F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in human carotid arteries: reproducibility, partial volume correction, and correlation between methods.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; John R Davies; Martin J Graves; James H F Rudd; Jonathan H Gillard; Peter L Weissberg; Tim D Fryer; Elizabeth A Warburton
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Conversion of arterial input functions for dual pharmacokinetic modeling using Gd-DTPA/MRI and 18F-FDG/PET.

Authors:  Eric Poulin; Réjean Lebel; Etienne Croteau; Marie Blanchette; Luc Tremblay; Roger Lecomte; M'hamed Bentourkia; Martin Lepage
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  A fast protocol for infarct quantification in mice.

Authors:  Guido Buonincontri; Carmen Methner; Thomas Krieg; T Adrian Carpenter; Stephen J Sawiak
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  MRI and PET in mouse models of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Guido Buonincontri; Carmen Methner; T Adrian Carpenter; Robert C Hawkes; Stephen J Sawiak; Thomas Krieg
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.355

View more
  1 in total

1.  Longitudinal mouse-PET imaging: a reliable method for estimating binding parameters without a reference region or blood sampling.

Authors:  Catriona Wimberley; Duc Loc Nguyen; Charles Truillet; Marie-Anne Peyronneau; Zuhal Gulhan; Matteo Tonietto; Fawzi Boumezbeur; Raphael Boisgard; Sylvie Chalon; Viviane Bouilleret; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.