Literature DB >> 9591599

Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation.

O G Rousset1, Y Ma, A C Evans.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The accuracy of PET for measuring regional radiotracer concentrations in the human brain is limited by the finite resolution capability of the scanner and the resulting partial volume effects (PVEs). We designed a new algorithm to correct for PVEs by characterizing the geometric interaction between the PET system and the brain activity distribution.
METHODS: The partial volume correction (PVC) algorithm uses high-resolution volumetric MR images correlated with the PET volume. We used a PET simulator to calculate recovery and cross-contamination factors of identified tissue components in the brain model. These geometry-dependent transfer coefficients form a matrix representing the fraction of true activity from each distinct brain region observed in any given set of regions of interest. This matrix can be inverted to correct for PVEs, independent of the tracer concentrations in each tissue component. A sphere phantom was used to validate the simulated point-spread function of the PET scanner. Accuracy and precision of the PVC method were assessed using a human basal ganglia phantom. A constant contrast experiment was performed to explore the recovery capability and statistic error propagation of PVC in various noise conditions. In addition, a dual-isotope experiment was used to evaluate the ability of the PVC algorithm to recover activity concentrations in small structures surrounded by background activity with a different radioactive half-life. This models the time-variable contrast between regions that is often seen in neuroreceptor studies.
RESULTS: Data from the three-dimensional brain phantom demonstrated a full recovery capability of PVC with less than 10% root mean-square error in terms of absolute values, which decreased to less than 2% when results from four PET slices were averaged. Inaccuracy in the estimation of 18F tracer half-life in the presence of 11C background activity was in the range of 25%-50% before PVC and 0%-6% after PVC, for resolution varying from 6 to 14 mm FWHM. In terms of noise propagation, the degradation of the coefficient of variation after PVC was found to be easily predictable and typically on the order of 25%.
CONCLUSION: The PVC algorithm allows the correction for PVEs simultaneously in all identified brain regions, independent of tracer levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9591599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  303 in total

1.  Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose/poitron-emission tomography (FDG/PET).

Authors:  M J de Leon; A Convit; O T Wolf; C Y Tarshish; S DeSanti; H Rusinek; W Tsui; E Kandil; A J Scherer; A Roche; A Imossi; E Thorn; M Bobinski; C Caraos; P Lesbre; D Schlyer; J Poirier; B Reisberg; J Fowler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Partial volume effect correction in SPECT for striatal uptake measurements in patients with neurodegenerative diseases: impact upon patient classification.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Pierre Malick Koulibaly; Jacques Darcourt; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  FDG-PET: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Mortelmans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  An MR image-guided, voxel-based partial volume correction method for PET images.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of a 3D local multiresolution algorithm for the correction of partial volume effects in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Adrien Le Pogam; Mathieu Hatt; Patrice Descourt; Nicolas Boussion; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Federico E Turkheimer; Caroline Prunier-Aesch; Jean-Louis Baulieu; Denis Guilloteau; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Autosomal Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease: Analysis of genetic subgroups by Machine Learning.

Authors:  Diego Castillo-Barnes; Li Su; Javier Ramírez; Diego Salas-Gonzalez; Francisco J Martinez-Murcia; Ignacio A Illan; Fermin Segovia; Andres Ortiz; Carlos Cruchaga; Martin R Farlow; Chengjie Xiong; Neil R Graff-Radford; Peter R Schofield; Colin L Masters; Stephen Salloway; Mathias Jucker; Hiroshi Mori; Johannes Levin; Juan M Gorriz
Journal:  Inf Fusion       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 12.975

8.  Reduced serotonin receptors and transporters in normal aging adults: a meta-analysis of PET and SPECT imaging studies.

Authors:  Teresa M Karrer; Casey L McLaughlin; Carmela P Guaglianone; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Partial volume correction in quantitative amyloid imaging.

Authors:  Yi Su; Tyler M Blazey; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Daniel S Marcus; Beau M Ances; Randall J Bateman; Nigel J Cairns; Patricia Aldea; Lisa Cash; Jon J Christensen; Karl Friedrichsen; Russ C Hornbeck; Angela M Farrar; Christopher J Owen; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman; William Klunk; Julie C Price; Paul M Thompson; Bernadino Ghetti; Andrew J Saykin; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Peter R Schofield; Virginia Buckles; John C Morris; Tammie L S Benzinger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A method for partial volume correction of PET-imaged tumor heterogeneity using expectation maximization with a spatially varying point spread function.

Authors:  David L Barbee; Ryan T Flynn; James E Holden; Robert J Nickles; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.