Literature DB >> 22570280

Conversion of arterial input functions for dual pharmacokinetic modeling using Gd-DTPA/MRI and 18F-FDG/PET.

Eric Poulin1, Réjean Lebel, Etienne Croteau, Marie Blanchette, Luc Tremblay, Roger Lecomte, M'hamed Bentourkia, Martin Lepage.   

Abstract

Reaching the full potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-positron emission tomography (PET) dual modality systems requires new methodologies in quantitative image analyses. In this study, methods are proposed to convert an arterial input function (AIF) derived from gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in MRI, into a (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) AIF in PET, and vice versa. The AIFs from both modalities were obtained from manual blood sampling in a F98-Fisher glioblastoma rat model. They were well fitted by a convolution of a rectangular function with a biexponential clearance function. The parameters of the biexponential AIF model were found statistically different between MRI and PET. Pharmacokinetic MRI parameters such as the volume transfer constant (K(trans)), the extravascular-extracellular volume fraction (ν(e)), and the blood volume fraction (ν(p)) calculated with the Gd-DTPA AIF and the Gd-DTPA AIF converted from (18)F-FDG AIF normalized with or without blood sample were not statistically different. Similarly, the tumor metabolic rates of glucose (TMRGlc) calculated with (18) F-FDG AIF and with (18) F-FDG AIF obtained from Gd-DTPA AIF were also found not statistically different. In conclusion, only one accurate AIF would be needed for dual MRI-PET pharmacokinetic modeling in small animal models.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22570280     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  12 in total

Review 1.  Determination of the Input Function at the Entry of the Tissue of Interest and Its Impact on PET Kinetic Modeling Parameters.

Authors:  M'hamed Bentourkia
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow and infarct size using ¹¹C-acetate micro-PET imaging in mice.

Authors:  Etienne Croteau; Jennifer M Renaud; Matthew McDonald; Ran Klein; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Comparison of first pass bolus AIFs extracted from sequential 18F-FDG PET and DSC-MRI of mice.

Authors:  Eleanor Evans; Stephen J Sawiak; Alexander O Ward; Guido Buonincontri; Robert C Hawkes; T Adrian Carpenter
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 1.455

5.  Perfusion weighted imaging using combined gradient/spin echo EPIK: Brain tumour applications in hybrid MR-PET.

Authors:  N Jon Shah; Nuno André da Silva; Seong Dae Yun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Imaging tumor metabolism using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  David Y Lewis; Dmitry Soloviev; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Incorporation of MRI-AIF information for improved kinetic modelling of dynamic PET data.

Authors:  Hasan Sari; Kjell Erlandsson; Kris Thielemans; David Atkinson; Simon Arridge; Sebastien Ourselin; Brian Hutton
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-07

Review 8.  Potential clinical applications of bimodal PET-MRI or SPECT-MRI agents.

Authors:  Rafael T M de Rosales
Journal:  J Labelled Comp Radiopharm       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 1.921

9.  Combining MRI with PET for partial volume correction improves image-derived input functions in mice.

Authors:  Eleanor Evans; Guido Buonincontri; David Izquierdo; Carmen Methner; Rob C Hawkes; Richard E Ansorge; Thomas Krieg; T Adrian Carpenter; Stephen J Sawiak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  Modelling the impact of injection time on the bolus shapes in PET-MRI AIF Conversion.

Authors:  Hasan Sari; Kjell Erlandsson; Anna Barnes; David Atkinson; Simon Arridge; Sebastien Ourselin; Brian Hutton
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.