Literature DB >> 26202120

Development and Validation of Digital Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Stool.

Linan Song1, Mingwei Zhao1, David C Duffy1, Joshua Hansen2, Kelsey Shields2, Manida Wungjiranirun2, Xinhua Chen2, Hua Xu2, Daniel A Leffler2, Susan P Sambol3, Dale N Gerding3, Ciarán P Kelly2, Nira R Pollock4.   

Abstract

The currently available diagnostics for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have major limitations. Despite mounting evidence that toxin detection is paramount for diagnosis, conventional toxin immunoassays are insufficiently sensitive and cytotoxicity assays too complex; assays that detect toxigenic organisms (toxigenic culture [TC] and nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT]) are confounded by asymptomatic colonization by toxigenic C. difficile. We developed ultrasensitive digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for toxins A and B using single-molecule array technology and validated the assays using (i) culture filtrates from a panel of clinical C. difficile isolates and (ii) 149 adult stool specimens already tested routinely by NAAT. The digital ELISAs detected toxins A and B in stool with limits of detection of 0.45 and 1.5 pg/ml, respectively, quantified toxins across a 4-log range, and detected toxins from all clinical strains studied. Using specimens that were negative by cytotoxicity assay/TC/NAAT, clinical cutoffs were set at 29.4 pg/ml (toxin A) and 23.3 pg/ml (toxin B); the resulting clinical specificities were 96% and 98%, respectively. The toxin B digital ELISA was 100% sensitive versus cytotoxicity assay. Twenty-five percent and 22% of the samples positive by NAAT and TC, respectively, were negative by the toxin B digital ELISA, consistent with the presence of organism but minimal or no toxin. The mean toxin levels by digital ELISA were 1.5- to 1.7-fold higher in five patients with CDI-attributable severe outcomes, versus 68 patients without, but this difference was not statistically significant. Ultrasensitive digital ELISAs for the detection and quantification of toxins A and B in stool can provide a rapid and simple tool for the diagnosis of CDI with both high analytical sensitivity and high clinical specificity.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26202120      PMCID: PMC4572538          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01334-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  43 in total

1.  Relapse versus reinfection: surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Mini Kamboj; Perminder Khosa; Anna Kaltsas; N Esther Babady; Crystal Son; Kent A Sepkowitz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Molecular methods to study transcriptional regulation of Clostridium difficile toxin genes.

Authors:  Ana Antunes; Bruno Dupuy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

3.  Single molecule measurements of tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin-6 in the plasma of patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Linan Song; David W Hanlon; Lei Chang; Gail K Provuncher; Cheuk W Kan; Todd G Campbell; David R Fournier; Evan P Ferrell; Andrew J Rivnak; Brian A Pink; Kaitlin A Minnehan; Purvish P Patel; David H Wilson; Mary A Till; William A Faubion; David C Duffy
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Comparison of strain typing results for Clostridium difficile isolates from North America.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Thomas Akerlund; Dale N Gerding; Richard V Goering; Therése Boström; Anna-Maria Jonsson; Edith Wong; Alan T Wortman; David H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Decreased cure and increased recurrence rates for Clostridium difficile infection caused by the epidemic C. difficile BI strain.

Authors:  Laurica A Petrella; Susan P Sambol; Adam Cheknis; Kristin Nagaro; Yin Kean; Pamela S Sears; Farah Babakhani; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Fifth-generation digital immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen by single molecule array technology.

Authors:  David H Wilson; David W Hanlon; Gail K Provuncher; Lei Chang; Linan Song; Purvish P Patel; Evan P Ferrell; Herbert Lepor; Alan W Partin; Dan W Chan; Lori J Sokoll; Carol D Cheli; Robert P Thiel; David R Fournier; David C Duffy
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Clostridium difficile testing algorithms using glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and C. difficile toxin enzyme immunoassays with C. difficile nucleic acid amplification testing increase diagnostic yield in a tertiary pediatric population.

Authors:  Kaede V Ota; Karin L McGowan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Isolation and detection of single molecules on paramagnetic beads using sequential fluid flows in microfabricated polymer array assemblies.

Authors:  Cheuk W Kan; Andrew J Rivnak; Todd G Campbell; Tomasz Piech; David M Rissin; Matthias Mösl; Andrej Peterça; Hans-Peter Niederberger; Kaitlin A Minnehan; Purvish P Patel; Evan P Ferrell; Raymond E Meyer; Lei Chang; David H Wilson; David R Fournier; David C Duffy
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detection of Clostridium difficile in the stool samples of patients with suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek Deshpande; Vinay Pasupuleti; David D K Rolston; Anil Jain; Narayan Deshpande; Chaitanya Pant; Adrian V Hernandez
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Outcomes in patients tested for Clostridium difficile toxins.

Authors:  Christopher R Polage; David L Chin; Jhansi L Leslie; Jevon Tang; Stuart H Cohen; Jay V Solnick
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.803

View more
  22 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile PCR Cycle Threshold Predicts Free Toxin.

Authors:  Fiona Senchyna; Rajiv L Gaur; Saurabh Gombar; Cynthia Y Truong; Lee F Schroeder; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Toxins for Optimized Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Nira R Pollock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Christopher R Polage; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins and laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Shuyi Chen; Huawei Gu; Chunli Sun; Haiying Wang; Jufang Wang
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

6.  Strategies for Optimizing the Diagnostic Predictive Value of Clostridium difficile Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  Larry K Kociolek
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Amelita Bartolome; Anna Almazan; Stanley Tam; Sheryl Biscocho; Salina Abusali; Jeffrey J Bishop; Niamh Nolan; Joel Estis; John Todd; Stephen Young; Fiona Senchyna; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Stool Toxin Concentrations in Adults With Symptomatic Infection and Asymptomatic Carriage Using an Ultrasensitive Quantitative Immunoassay.

Authors:  Nira R Pollock; Alice Banz; Xinhua Chen; David Williams; Hua Xu; Christine A Cuddemi; Alice X Cui; Matthew Perrotta; Eaman Alhassan; Brigitte Riou; Aude Lantz; Mark A Miller; Ciaran P Kelly
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Host Immune Markers Distinguish Clostridioides difficile Infection From Asymptomatic Carriage and Non-C. difficile Diarrhea.

Authors:  Ciaran P Kelly; Xinhua Chen; David Williams; Hua Xu; Christine A Cuddemi; Kaitlyn Daugherty; Caitlin Barrett; Mark Miller; Agnès Foussadier; Aude Lantz; Alice Banz; Nira R Pollock
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Testing for Higher Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Kerrie Davies; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.